Historian on Trump indictment and holding leaders accountable


Historian on Trump indictment and holding leaders accountable – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Princeton University professor Julian Zelizer, editor of “The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: A First Historical Assessment,” discusses the latest criminal indictment against the former president as a result of special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the January 6 insurrection. Zelizer explains that, in bringing Trump to trial, the Department of Justice has boldly declared – regardless of the political fallout – it will hold our leaders accountable if they violate sacrosanct democratic principles.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Historian on Trump indictment: “The most important criminal trial in American history”


Our commentary comes from Princeton University history professor Julian Zelizer, editor of the book, “The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: A First Historical Assessment.”


The new indictment of former President Donald Trump constitutes a historic turning point. This promises to be the most important criminal trial in American history.

Under special counsel Jack Smith, the Department of Justice has boldly declared that accountability is essential to our democracy. 

Smith’s damning indictment has charged Trump with four counts of attempting to overturn the 2020 election. Trump’s actions threatened the peaceful transfer of power, a process that separates us from non-democratic countries.

trump-indictment-cover.jpg

Department of Justice


Through a concerted effort that culminated with a violent mob storming Capitol Hill, Trump rejected the integral norm undergirding a stable democratic system, namely that losers must accept legitimate defeats. Even President Richard Nixon, who resigned in disgrace as a result of the Watergate scandal, understood this to be true. 

With this indictment, the Department of Justice has broken with the controversial precedent established by President Gerald Ford in 1974, when he pardoned Nixon for any crimes that he might have committed. The impeachment process offered the possibility of holding Nixon accountable; Ford let the opportunity pass by. 

After almost a decade of Americans fighting over race, war and Watergate, Ford concluded it was more important to “heal” the nation by pardoning Nixon than allowing a lengthy legal trial to proceed.  Looking directly into the cameras, Ford warned Americans that if a trial took place, “Ugly passions would again be aroused, and our people would again be polarized in their opinions, and the credibility of our free institutions of government would again be challenged at home and abroad.”  

But the pardon did not heal the nation. We grew more divided. Many furious Americans claimed that Ford had been part of a corrupt deal. When Ford traveled to North Carolina, he arrived to see placards that asked: “Is Nixon Above the Law??”

His approval ratings plummeted.  

More pertinent, Ford entrenched a damaging norm that became part of our nostalgia, pushing leaders away from taking legal action against elected officials who abused their power.

Presidents have continued to feel imperial. 

Trump tested Ford’s proposition more than any president since Nixon – and Biden’s Department of Justice has responded that Ford was wrong.

We must preserve key guardrails that prevent the abuse of presidential power. If our leaders violate sacrosanct democratic principles, they will be held accountable regardless of the political fallout.

     
For more info:

     
Story produced by Jay Kernis. Editor: Maria Barrow.

    
See also:



Source link

Justice Department requests protective order in Trump election interference case to limit his public comments


The Justice Department has asked a federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in Washington to step in after he released a post online that appeared to promise revenge on anyone who goes after him.

Prosecutors on Friday requested that U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan issue a protective order concerning evidence in the case, a day after Trump pleaded not guilty to charges of trying to overturn his 2020 election loss and block the peaceful transition of power. The order, different from a “gag order,” would limit what information Trump and his legal team could share publicly about the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.

Chutkan on Saturday gave Trump’s legal team until 5 p.m. Monday to respond to the government’s request. Trump’s legal team, which has indicated he would look to slow the case down despite prosecutors’ pledge of a speedy trial, then filed a request to extend the response deadline to Thursday and to hold a hearing on the matter, saying it needed more time for discussion.

Chutkan swiftly denied that extension request Saturday evening, reaffirming that Trump must abide by Monday’s deadline.

Protective orders are common in criminal cases, but prosecutors said it’s “particularly important in this case” because Trump has posted on social media about “witnesses, judges, attorneys, and others associated with legal matters pending against him.”

Prosecutors pointed specifically to a post on Trump’s Truth Social platform from earlier Friday in which Trump wrote, in all capital letters, “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!”

Prosecutors said they are ready to hand over a “substantial” amount of evidence — “much of which includes sensitive and confidential information” — to Trump’s legal team.

They told the judge that if Trump were to begin posting about grand jury transcripts or other evidence provided by the Justice Department, it could have a “harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.”

Prosecutors’ proposed protective order seeks to prevent Trump and his lawyers from disclosing materials provided by the government to anyone other than people on his legal team, possible witnesses, the witnesses’ lawyers or others approved by the court. It would put stricter limits on “sensitive materials,” which would include grand jury witness testimony and materials obtained through sealed search warrants.

A Trump spokesperson said in an emailed statement that the former president’s post “is the definition of political speech,” and was made in response to “dishonest special interest groups and Super PACs.”

Chutkan, a former assistant public defender nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, has been one of the toughest punishers of rioters who stormed the Capitol in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, fueled by Trump’s baseless claims of a stolen election.

The indictment unsealed this past week accuses Trump of brazenly conspiring with allies to spread falsehoods and concoct schemes intended to overturn his election loss to Democrat Joe Biden as his legal challenges floundered in court.

The indictment chronicles how Trump and his allies, in what Smith described as an attack on a “bedrock function of the U.S. government,” repeatedly lied about the results in the two months after he lost the election and pressured his vice president, Mike Pence, and state election officials to take action to help him cling to power.

Trump faces charges including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and conspiracy to obstruct Congress’ certification of Biden’s electoral victory.

It’s the third criminal case brought this year against the early front-runner in the 2024 Republican presidential primary. But it’s the first case to try to hold Trump responsible for his efforts to remain in power during the chaotic weeks between his election loss and the attack by his supporters on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Smith has also charged Trump in Florida federal court with illegally hoarding classified documents at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate and thwarting government efforts to get them back.

The magistrate judge, in that case, agreed to a protective order in June that prohibits Trump and his legal team from publicly disclosing evidence turned over to them by prosecutors without prior approval. Prosecutors are seeking another protective order in that case with more rules about the defense team’s handling of classified evidence.

Trump is scheduled to stand trial in March in the New York case stemming from alleged “hush-money” payments made during the 2016 campaign, and in May in the classified documents case.  

After his court appearance on Thursday in the Washington case, Trump characterized the prosecution as a “persecution” designed to hurt his 2024 presidential campaign. His legal team has described it as an attack on his right to free speech and his right to challenge an election that he believed had been stolen.

Smith has said prosecutors will seek a “speedy trial” against Trump in the election case. Judge Chutkan has ordered the government to file a brief by Thursday proposing a trial date. The first court hearing in front of Chutkan is scheduled for Aug. 28.



Source link

Recapping Trump’s third criminal arraignment, inside the courtroom and out


Recapping Trump’s third criminal arraignment, inside the courtroom and out – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Former President Donald Trump appeared in a federal courtroom Thursday for his arraignment on four felony charges accusing him of trying to overturn the 2020 election results, pleading not guilty in the latest case brought by special counsel Jack Smith. CBS News chief election and campaign correspondent Robert Costa has a summary of the day’s events.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

What’s next for Trump after Jan. 6 arraignment?


What’s next for Trump after Jan. 6 arraignment? – CBS News

Watch CBS News


A historic day in Washington, D.C., Thursday where former President Donald Trump pleaded not guilty to federal charges stemming from the special counsel’s investigation into Jan. 6. CBS News political director Fin Gómez examines what happens next.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

How will the Jan. 6 case impact Trump’s 2024 White House bid?


How will the Jan. 6 case impact Trump’s 2024 White House bid? – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Donald Trump has been arraigned in federal court for his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Despite his legal woes, his support from Republican lawmakers hasn’t wavered. Political advisers Ashley Etienne and Maura Gillespie joined CBS News to unpack the political impact of Trump’s third indictment.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Will Trump’s First Amendment defense in Jan. 6 case hold up in court?


Will Trump’s First Amendment defense in Jan. 6 case hold up in court? – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Thursday’s arraignment is just step one in a lengthy legal process for former President Donald Trump. CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman examines what Trump and his legal team can expect in the coming months.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Where Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment stands in history


Where Trump’s Jan. 6 indictment stands in history – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Thursday saw the historic federal arraignment of a former U.S. president. Historian and University of Pennsylvania professor Mary Frances Berry joined CBS News to put Donald Trump’s third arraignment in historical context and discuss how it compares to previous presidential scandals.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Unpacking Trump’s defense in Jan. 6 case


Unpacking Trump’s defense in Jan. 6 case – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Donald Trump pleaded not guilty Thursday in a federal courthouse just blocks from Capitol Hill — where his alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election culminated in the violence of Jan. 6, 2021. CBS News’ Robert Costa and Scott MacFarlane report on the proceedings, then CBS News legal contributor Rebecca Roiphe examines what the former president’s defense is likely to be.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

What Trump’s Jan. 6 arraignment means for the nation


What Trump’s Jan. 6 arraignment means for the nation – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Donald Trump once again found himself being arraigned in federal court — this time accused of trying to overturn the 2020 election results. CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett breaks down Thursday’s arraignment, and what this case means for the nation.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link