Eskom Disputes Report Finding It Leads World Nitrogen Pollution


(Bloomberg) — Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd., South Africa’s state power company, disputed the findings of a Greenpeace report that it operates many of the world’s worst emission sites for toxic nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide.

Most Read from Bloomberg

The Major Air Polluters in Africa report, released Thursday by Greenpeace in collaboration with the Centre For Research on Energy and Clean Air, asserted that coal-fired plants operated by the utility account for five of the world’s 10 biggest single-source nitrogen-dioxide emission sites. The company also runs two of the 10 worst sulfur-dioxide sites, Greenpeace and CREA said.

“The Greenpeace report appears to rely on satellite interpretation of the high levels of nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide in the troposphere,” Eskom said in a response to queries. It “links the nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide measured many hundreds of meters above the ground to direct health impacts at ground level,” the utility added.

South Africa, which relies on coal for the generation of more than 80% of its electricity, has some of the world’s worst air pollution, with emission standards that, while considerably more lenient than in other major polluters China and India, are rarely enforced.

The company said that at ground level, its plants mostly comply with South African nitrogen-dioxide emission levels and where they don’t, it’s due to nearby vehicle traffic and other industrial sources.

The two newest of its 14 operating coal-fired plants, Medupi and Kusile, as well as Camden are fitted with so-called low NOx burners to reduce emissions of nitrogen dioxide and others may retrofitted with the equipment, it said. Flue-gas desulfurization units, which slash sulfur-dioxide emissions, are fitted at Medupi and Kusile, it said.

Still, that equipment is currently being bypassed at Kusile after an accident.

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2024 Bloomberg L.P.



Source link

Pence disputes Trump team’s characterization of lead-up to Jan. 6


Pence disputes Trump team’s characterization of lead-up to Jan. 6 – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Former Vice President Mike Pence refuted the notion that former President Donald Trump only asked him to delay the counting of electoral votes on Jan. 6, 2021, to allow for audits of state election results, disputing the characterization of their interactions made by some members of Trump’s legal team.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Trump lawyer says Pence will be defense’s “best witness” in 2020 election case as former VP disputes claims


Washington — Former President Donald Trump’s attorney John Lauro argued former Vice President Mike Pence will be the defense’s “best witness” in the federal case accusing Trump of trying to overturn the 2020 election results, even as Pence seeks to distance himself from Trump’s characterization of events.

In an interview with “Face the Nation” on Sunday, Lauro said he is not concerned about Pence potentially being called as a witness in the case. 

“The vice president will be our best witness,” Lauro said. “The reason why Vice President Pence will be so important to the defense is … number one, he agrees that John Eastman, who gave legal advice to President Trump, was an esteemed legal scholar. Number two, he agrees that there were election irregularities, fraud, unlawful actions at the state level. All of that will eviscerate any allegation of criminal intent on the part of President Trump.”

Trump is charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights for his alleged actions related to his 2020 election loss. Trump has pleaded not guilty, and Lauro said he would not take a plea deal. 

Pence is a key figure in the prosecution’s case, with the indictment portraying him as the central force resisting the alleged schemes to delay the transfer of power and repeatedly being pressured by Trump to overturn the Electoral College results. 

Pence has rejected the notion that Trump only asked him to pause the counting of electoral votes on Jan. 6, 2021, to allow for audits of state elections results.

“That’s not what happened,” Pence told “Face the Nation.” 

“From sometime in the middle of December, the president began to be told that I had some authority to reject or return votes back to the states,” Pence said. “I had no such authority.”

Pence said he told Trump that they should “let all the lawsuits play out, let the Congress do their work, to consider objections.” 

“But I said, at the end of the day, if the election goes the other way, I said we ought to take a bow, we ought to travel around the country,” he said.

Lauro acknowledged Trump and Pence disagreed on how the electoral votes should have been handled.

“Now, of course, there was a constitutional disagreement between Vice President Pence and President Trump,” Lauro said. “But the bottom line is never, never in our country’s history have those kinds of disagreements been prosecuted criminally.” 

“The ultimate request was to allow the states time to audit and rectify,” Lauro continued. “Ultimately, Vice President Pence disagreed with that. And following that there was a transition of power.” 

Despite the disagreement, Lauro said Pence never told Trump his alleged actions were criminal. 

“He may have disagreed about a constitutional position but he never characterized it as criminal,” he said. 

Pence said he will testify if the case against Trump goes to trial if he is required.





Source link

Pence disputes Trump legal team’s claims, and says Trump asked him “what he thought” they should do after 2020 election


Former Vice President Mike Pence refuted the notion that former President Donald Trump only asked him to delay the counting of electoral votes on Jan. 6, 2021, to allow for audits of state election results, disputing the characterization of their interactions made by some members of Trump’s legal team.

“That’s not what happened,” Pence said during an interview with “Face the Nation” airing Sunday.

“From sometime in the middle of December, the president began to be told that I had some authority to reject or return votes back to the states,” he continued. “I had no such authority.”

On Tuesday, Trump was indicted for a second time on federal charges. This most recent indictment stemmed from his efforts to remain in power after losing the 2020 presidential election, efforts which culminated in the violent attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

The indictment included four charges against Trump: conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights.

One of the allegations against Trump is that he attempted to enlist Pence to use his ceremonial role in affirming the election vote count on Jan. 6 to “fraudulently overturn the results of the election.”

“There was no discretion ever given to the vice president in history, nor should there ever be,” Pence told “Face the Nation.” “I had no right to overturn the election and Kamala Harris will have no right to overturn the election when we beat them in 2024.”

The indictment refers to contemporaneous notes taken by the vice president in the weeks leading up to Jan. 6, when prosecutors allege Trump repeatedly pressured him to reject the electoral votes.

“From time to time, particularly at important moments, I had a practice of scribbling a note or two on my calendar just to memorialize it and remember it and I did that in this case,” he told “Face the Nation.” “I generally didn’t make a practice of taking notes in meetings over the four year period of time.”

But “given the momentous events that were unfolding,” he took a few notes to remind himself of what had been said. 

“From very early on, the very first time the president raised the issue with me, that he was being told that I had the right to overturn the election to reject or return votes, I told him, I knew I had no such authority,” Pence said.

“I truly do believe that, you know, no one who ever puts himself over the Constitution should ever be President of the United States,” Pence added.

The former vice president also recalled an occasion before Christmas 2020 when Trump asked him “what he thought we ought to do.”

“We were just the two of us in the Oval Office,” Pence said. 

“I remember, I looked at him and I said, look, let all the lawsuits play out, let the Congress do their work, to consider objections. But I said, at the end of the day, if the election goes the other way, I said we ought to take a bow, we ought to travel around the country,” he said.

“And I remember, the president is standing in front of his desk, listening very intently to me, and I’ll never forget the way he just kind of pointed at me as if to, as if to say, that’s worth thinking about,” Pence continued. “But I don’t know what was in his mind at the time.”

When asked if he would testify if the case against Trump went to trial, Pence said he would if summoned.

“We’ll respond to the call of the law if it comes and we’ll just tell the truth,” said Pence.

He also added that he “would hope” Trump would receive a fair trial in the District of Columbia.

“Whatever the outcome of this indictment,” Pence said, “I know I did my duty that day.”



Source link