Georgia judge hears Trump’s First Amendment claim in election interference case


Georgia judge hears Trump’s First Amendment claim in election interference case – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers argue his Fulton County election interference case should be dismissed because the acts he is charged with are protected under the Constitution’s First Amendment. CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman has the latest on the case.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

One question both Republican job applicants and potential Trump jurors must answer


There’s one question both prosecutors and Republican hiring bosses want to know: “Do you believe the 2020 election was stolen?” 

After a recent purge of the Republican National Committee, when the new leadership backed by former President Donald Trump fired more than 60 staffers, job applicants for positions in key states are being asked about their views of the 2020 election results, according to two Republican sources with knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to CBS News. This line of questioning appears to be a test of their loyalty to Trump — and was described as “insane” by a Republican Party source with knowledge of the interviews. 

The same question has been raised in Manhattan courtrooms. It was posed to jurors in a recent civil trial in which Trump was a defendant, and may be posed during jury selection in his upcoming criminal trial. 

Trump’s first criminal trial, centering around “hush money” payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels, is set to begin in April. Prosecutors see asking potential jurors for their perspectives on the 2020 election results as a way to glean whether “they can be fair and impartial.”

Joshua Steinglass, a lawyer for the district attorney, argued during a Feb. 15 pretrial hearing that jurors should be asked if any of them believe the 2020 election was stolen since “an affirmative answer here demonstrates an unwillingness to follow the facts and blindly rely on statements” made by Trump and could indicate that a juror “may not be willing to follow” the judge’s instructions.

“Over half the population of this country believe the election was stolen,” responded Trump attorney Todd Blanche, citing no evidence to back up that claim, while disputing the need for the question. “This has nothing to do with the facts of this case.”

Trump has been charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records as part of an attempt to cover up the story of his alleged affair with Daniels from coming out before the 2016 election. He pleaded not guilty to all charges.

His allegations claiming election fraud during the 2020 presidential election have been proven baseless.

A prosecutor acknowledged copying the election question from jury selection in another recent trial. Left unsaid was that it was a case Trump had lost. 

During jury selection in the January trial pitting Trump against the writer E. Jean Carroll, prospective jurors were asked if any of them thought the 2020 presidential election had been stolen. When a man and a woman stood up, Trump turned to look at each of them. His adviser, Boris Epshteyn, sat behind him and appeared to smile. 

It was Trump’s first time in a courtroom with a jury for one of his trials. He carefully watched the potential jurors as they were asked a series of politics-related questions, including whether they had voted in the 2016 or 2020 elections, were registered with a political party or had attended a Trump rally. Neither person who thought the election had been stolen was selected for the jury.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office said that the jury questions in the Carroll case had enabled the “well-respected” judge, Lewis Kaplan, to narrow jurors down quickly. 

Trump was ultimately ordered to pay Carroll $83.3 million. He is appealing the verdict. 

The issue of what jurors should reveal about their political views is emerging throughout the former president’s trials. Special counsel Jack Smith has also proposed asking potential jurors for the Florida classified documents case about their beliefs on whether the 2020 presidential election was stolen.

Blanche summed up during the February hearing what lawyers on both sides are truly hoping to ascertain from prospective jurors.

“What we all want to know, and what they want to know is: Do they like President Trump?” he said.



Source link

Biden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: “They have a point”


Biden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: “They have a point” – CBS News

Watch CBS News


The majority of Americans now oppose Israel’s military action in Gaza, according to a new Gallup poll. On Tuesday, President Biden acknowledged pro-Palestinian protesters who interrupted his speech in North Carolina. Semafor politics reporter Shelby Talcott and Washington Post national political reporter Hannah Knowles join “America Decides” with analysis.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Gag order restricts Trump in “hush money” New York trial


Gag order restricts Trump in “hush money” New York trial – CBS News

Watch CBS News


The judge presiding over former President Donald Trump’s New York “hush money” case imposed a gag order Tuesday restricting what Trump can say about those involved in the upcoming trial. CBS News’ Robert Costa reports.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Disciplinary council characterizes Trump DOJ official Jeffrey Clark’s actions surrounding the 2020 election as “coup attempt”


Former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark‘s efforts to help then-President Donald Trump overturn the 2020 election were characterized Tuesday as a coup attempt by Washington, D.C., Office of Disciplinary Counsel at a hearing to determine if Clark should be sanctioned.

Clark is accused of attempting to engage in dishonest conduct during his role in aftermath of the last presidential election.

Much of the hearing before the three-member Board of Responsibility focused on a letter which Clark sent to his superiors at the time, Jeffrey Rosen and Richard Donoghue. Clark suggested the letter be sent to Georgia indicating that the Justice Department was investigating irregularities in the state’s election and state lawmakers should void President Biden’s electoral win.

Hamilton Fox III, the disciplinary counsel at the hearing, said the letter and Clark’s continued attempts to intercede on Trump’s behalf, including multiple meetings with Trump in violation Justice Department procedure, were “essentially a coup attempt at the Department of Justice.” 

Capitol Riot Investigation Trump Justice Official
Jeffrey Clark, then-Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, speaks during a news conference at the Justice Department in Washington, on Sept. 14, 2020. 

Susan Walsh / AP


Clark’s attorney, Harry MacDougald, said the action being taken against his client was unprecedented. He said the letter was not supposed to have been public and should have fallen under various privilege protections. He added that the letter was part of the debate that normally occurs between lawyers. He said punishing Clark in those circumstances would have a “chilling effect,” a point that Donoghue agreed with during the cross examination portion of his testimony when he said it could discourage people from “being as candid as they otherwise might be.” 

Much of the hearing played like a rerun of the fraud claims from the 2020 election and the House Jan. 6 committee testimony, including a rehash of the dramatic Jan. 3, 2021 meeting when several attorneys within the White House and Justice Department threatened to quit if Trump fired Rosen as the acting attorney general and named Clark.

The testimony also highlighted how much pressure was put on the Justice Department directly by Trump. He spoke multiple times to Donoghue and Rosen about allegations of fraud and misconduct. 

As events continued the pair met with Clark at one point to talk about the letter in what Donoghue described as a contentious meeting. He said he and Rosen tried to convince Clark that the department had examined various claims, while other things fell outside the department’s purview. “We fundamentally disagreed on what the evidence showed,” Donoghue said during testimony. “It was just we were almost living in two different worlds.” 

Former deputy White House counsel Patrick Philbin, who knew Clark, testified that he spoke with the then-acting head of the Civil Division and told him the theories he was espousing and had been debunked. But, Philbin said, he felt Clark pursued what he thought was his duty because Clark believed there were serious issues in the election. 

During his testimony Donoghue acknowledged that there were instances of fraud and misconduct that year but nothing of a level to overturn the election. MacDougald’s questioning focused on absentee balloting in Fulton County, Georgia and how there were legitimate concerns that had not been fully examined by the department.

The hearing is expected to resume Wednesday with Rosen testifying.

Clark could be sanctioned or disbarred. Any sanctions could be appealed to the D.C. Court of Appeals.   



Source link

3/26: Prime Time with John Dickerson


3/26: Prime Time with John Dickerson – CBS News

Watch CBS News


John Dickerson reports on the collapse of a major bridge in Baltimore, Trump’s social media company’s stock market debut, and why the Supreme Court is skeptical about restricting abortion pill access.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

What to know about Trump Media’s stock market debut


What to know about Trump Media’s stock market debut – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Trading began Tuesday for the Trump Media & Technology Group, parent to former President Donald Trump’s Truth Social media platform. The firm ended the day at nearly $58 per share with a total valuation of $7.9 billion. Amrith Ramkumar, finance reporter for The Wall Street Journal, joins CBS News to assess the stock’s debut performance.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Trump hit with gag order in “hush money” case


Trump hit with gag order in “hush money” case – CBS News

Watch CBS News


A New York judge overseeing Donald Trump’s upcoming “hush money” criminal trial imposed a gag order on the former president Tuesday. CBS News investigative reporter Graham Kates explains what the order means for Trump.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Trump’s Truth Social soars in first day of trading on Nasdaq


Trump’s Truth Social soars in first day of trading on Nasdaq – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Former President Donald Trump’s Truth Social began trading under the ticker “DJT” on Tuesday, putting the real estate tycoon — and his initials — at the helm of a publicly traded company once again. CBS News’ Lilia Luciano has more.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link