Breaking down Trump’s free speech claims in Georgia election case


Breaking down Trump’s free speech claims in Georgia election case – CBS News

Watch CBS News


A judge in the Georgia 2020 election case heard arguments Thursday over whether former President Donald Trump’s First Amendment rights shield him from prosecution. CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman joins “America Decides” with key takeaways.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Georgia judge hears Trump’s First Amendment claim in election interference case


Georgia judge hears Trump’s First Amendment claim in election interference case – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers argue his Fulton County election interference case should be dismissed because the acts he is charged with are protected under the Constitution’s First Amendment. CBS News campaign reporter Katrina Kaufman has the latest on the case.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

3/24/2024: The Right to be Wrong; AMLO; Law of the Sea


3/24/2024: The Right to be Wrong; AMLO; Law of the Sea – CBS News

Watch CBS News


First, a report on the spread of misinformation on social media. Then, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador: The 60 Minutes Interview. And, U.S. fails to ratify treaty for ocean mining.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Misinformation spreads online as some in Congress fight what they see as censorship


Misinformation spreads online as some in Congress fight what they see as censorship – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Misinformation is spreading on social media as some fight to stop what they call censorship. The Supreme Court is now grappling with how the First Amendment applies to the online world.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Barr says Trump prosecution is a “legitimate case”


Barr says Trump prosecution is a “legitimate case” – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Former Attorney General William Barr said the special counsel’s case against former President Donald Trump is “legitimate” and doesn’t “run afoul of the First Amendment.”

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Barr says Trump prosecution is “legitimate case” and doesn’t “run afoul of the First Amendment”


Washington — Former Attorney General WIlliam Barr dismissed the argument that the election interference case against former President Donald Trump is not valid because his statements were protected by the First Amendment. 

“It’s certainly a challenging case, but I don’t think it runs afoul of the First Amendment,” Barr told “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “From a prosecutor’s standpoint, I think it’s a legitimate case.” 

Trump’s legal team argues he was indicted for political speech that was protected by the First Amendment. The indictment itself acknowledges that Trump “had a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-determinative fraud during the election and that he had won.” 

“If that was all it was about, I would be concerned on a First Amendment front,” Barr said. 

But Trump’s alleged actions went beyond political speech, he said.  

“This involved a situation where the states had already made the official and authoritative determination as to who won in those states and they sent the votes and certified them to Congress,” Barr said. “The allegation, essentially, by the government is that at that point, the president conspired, entered into a plan, a scheme, that involved a lot of deceit, the object of which was to erase those votes, to nullify those lawful votes.”

“The other elements were the substitution of bogus panels — that were not authorized panels —  to claim that they had alternative votes,” he said. “And that was clearly wrong and the certifications they signed were false. But then pressuring the vice president to use that as a pretext to adopt the Trump votes and reject the Biden votes or even to delay it — it really doesn’t matter whether it’s to delay it or to adopt it or to send it to the House of Representatives. You have to remember a conspiracy crime is completed at the time it’s agreed to and the first steps are taken. That’s when the crime is complete.” 

Special counsel Jack Smith brought four felony charges against Trump last week in the 2020 election interference case, including conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding; obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding; and conspiracy against rights. Trump has pleaded not guilty. 

Barr declined to say whether he was interviewed by the special counsel during the investigation, but said he would “of course” appear as a witness if called.

The former attorney general, who resigned from the Trump administration in December 2020, said he told Trump on at least three occasions that “in no uncertain terms that there was no evidence of fraud that would have changed the outcome.” 





Source link