Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg says “we don’t fully know” conditions for Baltimore bridge repair


Washington — Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said that as officials eye rebuilding efforts, it’s not fully known the condition of what remains of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore after it collapsed days ago when it was hit by a cargo ship.

“A lot goes into how that reconstruction will be designed, how the process is going to work,” Buttigieg said on “Face the Nation” on Sunday. He noted that he didn’t have an estimate on the rebuilding timeline, but the bridge itself took five years to initially construct. “Right now we don’t fully know everything we need to know about the condition of the portions of the bridge that did not collapse.”

First, as officials are working to clear debris and reopen the channel. Buttigieg said it remains unclear how long that process will take, but the work is “underway.” He said that it’s going to be a “very complex process,” noting the process for dismantling what remains of the bridge safely. 

“It has to be done because that is the only way to get into most of the Port of Baltimore,” Buttigieg said, making clear its importance not only to Maryland but also for national supply chains.

Then there’s the process of rebuilding the bridge, which is expected to take longer. Buttigieg noted that work is already underway there as well, after the federal government released $60 million in emergency relief funding. Additional emergency funds are expected to follow. 

“This is not going to happen overnight, but we’re going to help Maryland do it as quickly as they responsibly can,” Buttigieg said. 

The administration is expected to turn to Congress to approve additional funding to rebuild the bridge. Last week, President Biden outlined that he wants the federal government to pay for the entire cost of the bridge’s reconstruction, adding that he expects Congress to support the effort. But they may face opposition from some Republicans.

Buttigieg said the pitch to lawmakers is that “your district could be next.”

“This has historically been bipartisan,” he said, noting support for bridge rebuilding funds in a 2007 collapse along with support for the Bipartisan Infrastructure package in 2021. “If there’s anything left in this country that is more bipartisan than infrastructure, it should be emergency response. This is both, and I hope that Congress will be willing if and when we turn to them.” 

Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, who also appeared on “Face the Nation” on Sunday, said he has the “best congressional delegation in the United States Congress,” and Maryland lawmakers have been on the ground in Baltimore and “are going to do everything in their power to bring back resources for this tragedy.”

The mayor said that “no party conversation should be involved at all” in the discussion of how aid will be sent to Baltimore. 



Source link

Pete Buttigieg says “we don’t fully know” conditions for Baltimore bridge repair


Pete Buttigieg says “we don’t fully know” conditions for Baltimore bridge repair – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg tells “Face the Nation” that as officials are assessing how to reconstruct the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, “right now we don’t fully know everything we need to know about the condition of the portions of the bridge that did not collapse.”

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Israeli court halts subsidies for ultra-Orthodox who don’t serve in army



TEL AVIV — Israel’s Supreme Court on Thursday ordered an end to government subsidies for many ultra-Orthodox men who do not serve in the army — a blockbuster ruling that could have far-reaching consequences for the government and the tens of thousands of religious men who refuse to take part in mandatory military service.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces the most serious threat yet to his government as he struggles to bridge a major split over military service in the shaky national unity government cobbled together in the days after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack.

Inside his coalition, the powerful bloc of ultra-Orthodox parties — longtime partners of Netanyahu — want draft exemptions to continue. The centrist members of his War Cabinet, both former military generals, have insisted that all sectors of Israeli society contribute equally during its war against Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip.

If the ultra-Orthodox parties leave the government, the country would be forced into new elections, with Netanyahu trailing significantly in the polls amid the war.

Most Jewish men are required to serve nearly three years in the military, followed by years of reserve duty. Jewish women serve two mandatory years.

But the politically powerful ultra-Orthodox, who make up roughly 13% of Israeli society, have traditionally received exemptions while studying full time in religious seminaries.

The exemptions — coupled with government stipends many seminary students receive through age 26 — have infuriated much of the general public. These longstanding tensions have grown during nearly six months of war — in which over 500 Israeli soldiers have been killed.

The Supreme Court has ruled the current system discriminatory and given the government until Monday to present a new plan and until June 30 to pass it. Netanyahu on Thursday asked the court for a 30-day extension to find a compromise.

The court did not immediately respond to his request. But it issued an interim order barring the government from funding the monthly subsidies for religious students who are between the ages of 18 and 26 and have not received a deferral from the military in the past year. Funds will be frozen starting April 1.

The ruling will affect about a third of the 180,000 seminary students who receive subsidies from the government for full-time learning, according to Israel’s Channel 12 TV. It said the subsidies could be temporarily covered by the governing coalition’s discretionary funds.

Benny Gantz, Netanyahu’s top political rival and a member of the three-man War Cabinet, praised the court’s decision and said it recognized “the need for soldiers during a difficult war, and the need for everyone in our society to take part in the right to serve the country.”

Among Israel’s Jewish majority, mandatory military service is largely seen as a melting pot and rite of passage, and the army has said it is suffering from manpower shortages because of the war in Gaza.

The ultra-Orthodox say that integrating into the army will threaten their generations-old way of life and that their devout lifestyle and dedication to upholding the Jewish commandments protect Israel as much as a strong army. Religious leaders have vowed to fight attempts to force ultra-Orthodox men into the army and have staged mass protests against similar attempts in the past.

Aryeh Deri, head of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, called the court’s decision “unprecedented bullying of Torah students in the Jewish state.”

In his letter to the Supreme Court requesting the extension, Netanyahu said additional time is needed to come to an agreement, “because it has been proven in the past that enlistment without an agreed-upon arrangement actually has the opposite effect.”



Source link

Why some Haitians don’t want foreign nations intervening in their crises — and others do



Johnny Celestin generally believes that Haiti, which continues to be under heightened violence from armed groups and gangs, must re-establish order on its own. 

“My heart is against foreign intervention,” said Celestin, chair of the nonprofit organization Konbit for Haiti. “I firmly believe in Haiti’s agency.” 

But now, with armed militias creating an unprecedented level of instability amid a weekslong leadership void, Celestin and others say foreign intervention may be necessary.

“I guarantee you,” Celestin said, “that people who are losing their homes, losing their lives, are not in a space where they’re saying, ‘Let us die because we’re so proud. We don’t want any foreign help to help us.”

Now living in New York City, Celestin is a native of Haiti and has lived there on and off for most of his life. He returned to Port-au-Prince in 2010 and traveled extensively throughout the country for 10 years. 

For generations, his beleaguered Caribbean nation has sought to achieve home-grown stability but, following the assassination of its democratically elected President Jovenel Moïse in 2021, armed groups took increasing control of the country’s capital. The  violence that immediately ensued put its citizens at yet another crossroads. Some Haitians say their country will only suffer further if foreign intervention is allowed, while others say international support is necessary for Haiti to overcome its political and humanitarian crises. 

Attempts have been made in the past to foster solutions at home. For example, the year Moïse was killed, a group of Haitian and non-Haitian religious leaders, women’s rights groups, lawyers, humanitarian workers and more formed the Commission to Search for a Haitian Solution to the Crisis. The commission proposed a two-year interim government with oversight committees tasked with restoring order, eradicating corruption and establishing fair elections. The group is still working to make its plan a reality. 

But as violence has ratcheted up in the last several months, the United Nations’ latest plan — drafted by the United States and Ecuador — is to send Kenyan troops in to police Haiti. The plan has drawn criticism from those who say Kenyans don’t speak Kreyòl or French and there is evidence of human rights abuses in the Kenyan army. The plan is currently on hold, but it falls in line with Haiti’s history, which is riddled with intervention from other nations, especially the U.S., with little evidence that these efforts have contributed to long lasting peace and stability in the country.

Celestin, like other Haitians, said he is inherently against foreign intervention as it has existed, but understands that it may be necessary to stem the tide of violence and poverty in Haiti. However, he said, any foreign intervention should support Haitians and their efforts rather than holding complete control over the country with no input from its citizens.

“The fight that needs to take place to save Port-au-Prince and to save Haiti, has to be a fight that is led by Haitians. I believe we have that capacity, if those folks feel they have backup … Once they clear an area, there’s got to be another force that can come in and ensure that they control it. And this is what I believe the international force can do.”

Monique Clesca of Port-au-Prince agrees that it is important for Haitians to work with foreign actors, but it must be on their own terms.

“There is an aspect of sovereignty that’s extremely important,” said Clesca, a member of the Commission to Search for a Haitian Solution to the Crisis. “Yes, we need to work with different partners; yes, we will need help; but it is not them who will dictate what kind of help we should get and when we should get it.”

However, Haitian scholars like Jemima Pierre have condemned the foreign intervention throughout Haiti’s history. Pierre, a professor at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, said foreign intervention, including from the U.S., is partially to blame for Haiti’s turmoil.

“What intervention means for Haiti, what it has always meant, is death and destruction,” Pierre said. “What’s the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.”

Destructive foreign intervention colors Haiti’s history as an independent nation 

Haitians’ skepticism about outside interference dates back to the birth of the country.

In 1791, Haitians began a revolt against slavery. They ousted their French masters and Haiti obtained its independence in 1804. The story was one of heroism and triumph, until France issued the newly freed Black country an ultimatum: pay 131 million francs in reparations to its former masters or face consequences. The new country was forced to pay what would be at least $21 billion in today’s dollars to avoid war and further economic restraint and to maintain its independence. 

The U.S., afraid the revolt would inspire its own enslaved people, did not recognize Haiti and worked to choke the country economically and diplomatically. It took the country more than 100 years to pay the debt. 

President Woodrow Wilson ordered the U.S. Marines to invade Haiti after the assassination of its president in 1915, citing concern about political unrest in the region. The U.S. implemented a government that it controlled, established segregation, and killed thousands of people during the 19-year occupation, according to The New York Times. Afterward, the U.S. controlled Haiti’s public finances, using a massive amount of the country’s income to repay debts to itself and France, NPR reported. 

The rise, fall and rise of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide 

Haiti’s history of economic and diplomatic oppression went largely ignored by France and other powerful nations in the centuries that followed, until Jean-Bertrand Aristide rose to power. Aristide became Haiti’s first democratically elected president in 1990. When four years later he was ousted in a military coup,  the U.S. sent 20,000 troops  to restore order in the country. Back in power, Aristide was vocal in his demands that France right the reparation wrongs and repay the money it had taken from Haiti for centuries.

In 2004, he was overthrown again. The U.S. encouraged him to step down this time and helped him escape with troops from France, Canada and Chile. However, Haitians liked Aristide and he long remained one of the most popular political figures in the country. Many believe that the international support to remove Aristide was prompted by his demands for reparations from France. 

“What’s going on in Haiti is a flare-up of a situation that’s been going on for 20 years, and that situation is a complete takeover of Haitian society and Haitian political systems by foreign powers. People think this is hyperbole, but it’s not,” Pierre said. “It’s 20 years ago that the U.S., France and Canada funded a coup d’état against Haiti’s democratically elected president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide.”

French and Haitian political figures have said that France, troubled by Aristide’s influence, began to work with his local opponents and the U.S. to remove him from power, The New York Times reported. France and the U.S. have denied these allegations. 

Once Aristide was out, the United Nations implemented a security effort led by the Brazilian military, known as MINUSTAH, from 2004 to 2017 — and then a small operation followed that lasted until 2019. This mission has been criticized and known for allegations of murders, rape and other atrocities, according to Harvard Law School’s human rights clinic. Amid all this, Haiti endured a devastating earthquake in 2010 that killed about 220,000 people, and another deadly earthquake in 2021. A cholera outbreak that killed at least 10,000 after the 2010 earthquake was traced back to U.N. peacekeepers sent from Nepal, according to The Washington Post. 

Matters only grew worse as Haiti struggled to regain its footing after the earthquakes, and as elections were repeatedly postponed following Moïse’s assassination in 2021. 

The U.S. and several other nations supported Ariel Henry, who had been prime minister under Moïse, to temporarily replace Moïse as the country’s leader. The unelected prime minister is deeply unpopular in Haiti, and this only worsened as he delayed the presidential election. Armed groups, already active in Port-au-Prince, dialed up the violence in the last year. 

These groups have been present in the country for decades alongside the establishment, with many politicians even using them to do their bidding, including everything from intimidating the opposition to collecting votes. As Henry continued to delay a presidential election, the rebel forces engaged in increasingly  daring acts and have now taken control of at least 80% of the capital, according to a United Nations estimate.  

Meanwhile, Haitians like Dave Ali Fils-Aimé have committed themselves to the country’s progress by launching programs that connect with and support Haitians directly. In 2013, Fils-Aimé founded Baskètbòl pou Ankadre Lajenès (Basketball to Uplift the Youth) to engage with children through the sport and educate them. The program operates in Cité Soleil and Martissant, two Port-au-Prince neighborhoods racked with violence from armed groups, and, according to Fils-Aimé, it serves as the perfect tool for keeping children from joining the armed groups terrorizing Port-au-Prince. 

In the past months, Baskètbòl pou Ankadre Lajenès has had to cut down its operations as the violent groups have closed in on their headquarters. For now, the organization is only working with children in close proximity to its headquarters. Still, Fils-Aimé says, it’s organizations like these that represent the self-determination and community that will be necessary to pull Haiti out of its persistent crises. 

“The government, because of its lack of capacity and high levels of corruption, they’re not investing in the youth as they should. So it’s incumbent upon organizations like ours to provide that support,” Fils-Aimé said. “We have some youth who started with us back in 2013, 2014, who are now in their final years of university. That’s a youth whose life you’ve saved by providing them with the opportunity to be part of this organization.”

For more from NBC BLK, sign up for our weekly newsletter.



Source link

Amid book bans, DEI cuts and ‘Don’t Say Gay’ laws, 7 states will mandate LGBTQ-inclusive curricula



Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, signed a law last week that includes a mandate for the state’s public schools to teach LGBTQ history, as red and blue states continue to diverge on whether schools should expose kids to gay and transgender identities.

The new law, Senate Bill 5462, mandates that the state’s school districts adopt curricula that is as “culturally and experientially diverse as possible,” including the histories of LGBTQ people, people of color and people with disabilities. Schools will be required to institute the inclusive curricula by the 2025-26 school year.

“The governor was happy to sign legislation that aims to ensure students of all races and identities feel safe and welcome at school,” Mike Faulk, a spokesperson for Inslee, said in an email Monday.

Faulk also referred NBC News to research published in the journal Sex Education that suggests LGBTQ-inclusive curricula can reduce rates of bullying and make children feel safer in school. 

Kristie Bennett is a high school teacher in Sammamish, Washington, who is bisexual and leads her school’s gender-sexuality alliance organization. In an interview last week with NBC affiliate KGW of Portland, Oregon, Bennett echoed Faulk’s sentiment. 

“I’ve seen firsthand how important an inclusive curriculum can be and how life-changing it can be to help a student see themselves in the curriculum instead of some old dead white guys from the 1700s,” Bennett said.

Washington is the seventh state to enact legislation mandating that public schools incorporate LGBTQ-inclusive curricula in some capacity, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ think tank. The other six are: California, New Jersey, Colorado, Oregon, Nevada and Illinois, states that have been won by Democrats in the last four presidential elections.

The law also comes as conservative lawmakers introduce record numbers of anti-LGBTQ measures, including legislation to regulate how LGBTQ issues are taught in public schools. 

Over the last several years, Republican officials have sought to limit how sexual orientation and gender identity are taught in school through measures critics have dubbed “Don’t Say Gay” laws; bans on books with queer storylines or characters; and disbandments of diversity, equity and inclusion programs at public universities.

Seven states — all but one of them led by Republicans — have laws in place that restrict the instruction of sexual orientation or gender identity in some public schools, according to MAP.

Gabriele Magni, an assistant professor of political science at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles and director of the school’s LGBTQ+ Politics Research Initiative, called the enactment of the measures to mandate LGBTQ history be taught at public schools a “reaction” to anti-LGBTQ measures introduced in red states.

“It’s similar to the analogy we’ve seen with abortion. On the one hand, you’ve seen states banning abortion or making it much more unrealistic,” Magni said. “And then, on the other hand, you’ve seen states like California or New York ramping up their protections and also offering a more welcoming environment for people who may come from out of state.”

LGBTQ advocates in Washington similarly suggested that their state’s new law was necessary to counter the idea from conservatives that queer identities are inappropriate for children. 

“It’s considered too controversial to mention to kids that Thoreau was gay or Walt Whitman was gay,” Ken Shulman, the executive director of Seattle-based LGBTQ advocacy group Lambert House, told KGW. “Alan Turing — who invented the first computer, helped serve the Enigma code and win World War II — was gay.”



Source link

Russian elections are ‘costly bureaucracy’ that ‘don’t have to be held,’ Putin spokesman says


A spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin claims the unified coalition around the leader makes democratic elections unnecessary and irrelevant.

Press secretary Dmitry Peskov remarked to Russian media that democratic elections have become a “costly bureaucracy” that serves no purpose due to the supposed widespread support for Putin.

“Elections are what a democracy demands and Putin himself decided to hold them, but theoretically, they don’t even have to be held,” Peskov told state media outlet RBK.

RUSSIAN OPPOSITION LEADER ALEXEI NAVALNY SENTENCED TO 19 YEARS IN PRISON

Kremlin Spokesman Peskov

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov attends a joint news conference of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko in Moscow.

He added, “Because it’s clear that Putin will be elected. That’s completely my personal opinion.”

Peskov told RBK he was seeking to clarify his statement to The New York Times earlier this week that he claims was misquoted.

READ ON THE FOX NEWS APP

“Our presidential election is not really democracy, it is costly bureaucracy,” Peskov told the New York Times in an article published Aug. 6. “Mr. Putin will be re-elected next year with more than 90 percent of the vote.”

RETIRED FBI COUNTERINTEL AGENT REPORTEDLY INVOLVED IN TRUMP-RUSSIA PROBE ARRESTED FOR TIES TO RUSSIA

Vladimir Putin

Russian President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with members of the government via a video conference at the Kremlin in Moscow.

The press secretary’s comments on Russian democracy follow the conviction of political opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who was found guilty of extremism by a Russian court on Friday.

Navalny, already serving a nine-year sentence on separate political charges, was sentenced to an additional 19 years.

“I understand perfectly that, as many political prisoners, I’m serving a life sentence, which is measured by the length of my life or the length of life of this regime,” Navalny told his supporters via social media.

Navalny has long been Putin’s most outspoken critic, leading anti-corruption watchdog organizations and protesting Kremlin policy.

In 2020, he sought medical attention in Germany after being poisoned with a nerve agent. He was arrested after returning to Moscow in January 2021.



Source link