Havana Syndrome mystery continues as a lead military investigator says bar for proof was set impossibly high


This report is the result of a joint investigation by 60 Minutes, The Insider, and Der Spiegel

Tonight we have important developments in our five-year investigation of mysterious brain injuries reported by U.S. national security officials. The injured include White House staff, CIA officers, FBI agents, military officers and their families. Many believe that they were wounded by a secret weapon that fires a high-energy beam of microwaves or ultrasound. This is our fourth story and for the first time, we have evidence of who might be responsible. Most of the injured have fought for America, often in secret. And they’re frustrated that the U.S. government publicly doubts that an adversary is targeting Americans.

One of them is Carrie. We’re disguising her and not using her last name because she’s still an FBI agent working in counterintelligence. She says, in 2021, she was home in Florida when she was hit by a crippling force.

Carrie: And bam, inside my right ear, it was like a dentist drilling on steroids. That feeling when it gets too close to your eardrum? It’s like that, you know, times ten. It was like a high pitched, metallic drilling noise, and it knocked me forward at, like, a 45 degree angle this way. 

She says she was by a window in her laundry room. 

Carrie: My right ear was line-of-sight to that window while this thing was happening in my ear. And when I leaned forward it kind a—it didn’t knock me over, but it knocked me forward. I immediately felt pressure, and pressure and pain started coursing from inside my right ear, down my jaw, down my neck and into my chest. 

At the same time, FBI agent Carrie told us, the battery in her phone began to swell until it broke the case. Finally she passed out on a couch. Because of chest pain, she was checked by a cardiologist and then returned to duty.

Carrie: And I remember complaining to my colleagues for months after that I felt like I had early Alzheimer’s. Short term memory, long term memory, confusing memories, uh, multitasking. My baseline changed. I was not the same person.  

FBI agent
60 Minutes has agreed to withhold the last name of “Carrie,” a Havana Syndrome victim who is still an FBI agent working in counterintelligence. 

60 Minutes


Carrie’s story matches those we’ve uncovered over the years.

Olivia Troye: It was like this piercing feeling on the side of my head. It was like, I remember it was on the right side of my head and I, I got like vertigo. 

Olivia Troye was Homeland Security adviser to Vice President Mike Pence. In our 2022 report, she told us she was hit outside the White House. 

Anonymous: And then severe ear pain started. So I liken it to if you put a Q-tip too far and you bounce it off your eardrum. Well, imagine takin’ a sharp pencil and just kinda pokin’ that. 

And this man told us he was among the first publicly known cases in 2016 from our embassy in Cuba. That’s how the incidents became known as “Havana Syndrome.” He’s medically retired from an agency we can’t name– blind in one eye and struggling for balance. 

A major medical study for the government was led by Dr. David Relman of Stanford University. In our 2022 report he told us… 

Dr. David Relman: What we found was we thought clear evidence of an injury to the auditory and vestibular system of the brain. Everything starting with the inner ear where humans perceive sound and sense balance, and then translate those perceptions into brain electrical signals.

His study found, “directed pulsed (radio frequency) energy…appears to be the most plausible mechanism…” For example, a focused beam of microwaves or acoustic ultrasound. More than 100 officials or family members have unexplained, persistent, symptoms. 

Carrie: If I turn too fast, my gyroscope is off, essentially. It’s like a step behind where I’m supposed to be. So I’ll turn too fast, and I will literally walk right into the wall or the door frame. 

Now, for the first time, the case of FBI agent Carrie suggests which adversary might be responsible. She spoke with the FBI’s permission but wasn’t allowed to discuss the cases she was on when she was hit. We have learned from other sources one of those cases involve this Mustang going 110 miles an hour. 

Deputy (on bodycam video from 2020): Pull over, Pull over!

In 2020, near Key West, Florida, deputies tried to stop the Mustang for speeding. It ran 15 miles until it hit spike strips laid in its path. 

Deputy (on bodycam video from 2020): Get out! Put it down! Get on the ground now.

A search of the car found notes of bank accounts.

Deputy (on bodycam video from 2020): Citibank…Discover Savings $75,000… 

And this device, that looks like a walkie-talkie, can erase the car’s computer data including its GPS record. There was also a Russian passport.

Deputy (on bodycam video from 2020): What’s your first name?

Vitalii Kovalev (on bodycam video from 2020): Vitalii. V-I-T-A-L-I-I.

Vitalii Kovalev was the driver, from St. Petersburg—Russia not Florida. 

Deputy (on bodycam video from 2020): Why did you run? Be honest with me.

Vitalii Kovalev (on bodycam video from 2020): I don’t know.

Deputy (on bodycam video from 2020): You know why you ran.

Vitalii Kovalev (on bodycam video from 2020): I don’t know.

And we don’t know why he ran. But what we learned suggests he was a Russian spy. 

Christo Grozev: What we see here is Vitalii Kovalev fitting exactly this formula. 

Christo Grozev is a journalist, legendary for unmasking Russian plots. In 2020, he uncovered the names of the Russian secret agents who poisoned Vladimir Putin’s rival Alexey Navalny. Grozev is lead investigator for our collaborator on this story, The Insider, a magazine by Russian exiles. We asked him to trace Vitalii Kovalev. 

Christo Grozev
Christo Grozev is a journalist for The Insider, an investigative magazine by Russian exiles.

60 Minutes


Christo Grozev: He studied in a military institute. He studied radio electronics with a particular focus on use within the military of micro-electronics. He had all the technology know-how that would be required for somebody to be assisting an operation that requires high technology. But then all of a sudden, after working for two years in a military institute he up and decides to become a chef.

Kovalev immigrated to the U.S. and worked as a chef in New York and Washington D.C., even appearing at far left, in a TV cooking segment. 

But Kovalev was actually a Russian military electrical engineer with a top secret security clearance. 

Scott Pelley: Can someone like Kovalev simply decide to drop all of that and become a chef?

Christo Grozev: It is not an easy job to just leave that behind. Once you’re in the military, and you’ve been trained, and the Ministry of Defense has invested in you, you remain at their beck and call for the rest of your life. 

We don’t know what Kovalev was up to but our sources say, over months, he spent 80 hours being interviewed by FBI agent Carrie, who had investigated multiple Russian spies. Kovalev pled guilty to evading police and reckless driving. He was sentenced to 30 months. While he was in jail, Carrie says she was hit in Florida and, a year later, when she awoke to the same symptoms in the middle of the night in California. 

Carrie: It felt like I was stuck in this state of, like, disorientation, not able to function. Like, what is happening? And my whole body was pulsing, 

Mark Zaid is Carrie’s attorney. He has a security clearance and for decades, has represented Americans working in national security. Zaid has more than two dozen clients suffering symptoms of Havana Syndrome, which the government now calls “anomalous health incidents.”

Mark Zaid: I have CIA and State Department clients as well, who believe they’ve been impacted domestically. There are dozens of CIA cases that have happened domestically that is at least believed. And, and we’re not even just talking about physical manifestation. We’re talking about evidence of computer issues in the midst of the incident where computer screens just literally stop working or go flicker on and off.

Scott Pelley: Do you know whether there are other FBI agents who have also suffered from these anomalous health incidents?

Mark Zaid: There are other FBI agents and personnel, not just agents, analysts. I represent one other FBI person who was impacted in Miami. And I also know of FBI personnel who believe they were hit overseas in the last decade.

Scott Pelley: Were any of these members of the FBI counterintelligence people in addition to Carrie? 

Mark Zaid: The one thread that I know of with the FBI personnel that is common among most if not all of my clients other than the family members connected to the employee, was they were all doing something relating to Russia. 

Attorney Mark Zaid
Attorney Mark Zaid

60 Minutes


Vitalii Kovalev served his time and in 2022, went back to Russia—ignoring American warnings that he was in danger because he’d spent so much time with the FBI. Christo Grozev found this death certificate from last year, which says Kovalev was killed at the front in Ukraine. 

Scott Pelley: Do you think Kovalev was sent to Ukraine as a punishment?

Christo Grozev: One theory is that he was sent there in order for him to be disposed of.

Scott Pelley: Is Kovalev really dead, or is this another cover story? 

Christo Grozev: That is a very good question. And we actually worked on both hypotheses for a while. I do believe at this point that he was dead.

Carrie: We’re dealing with energy weapons. It’s not going anywhere. Look how effective it’s been. It’s next generation weaponry. And, unfortunately, it’s been refined on some of us, and we’re the test subjects.

U.S. intelligence says, publicly, there is no credible evidence that an adversary is inflicting brain injuries on national security officials. And yet, more than 100 Americans have symptoms that scientists say could be caused by a beam of microwaves or, acoustic ultrasound. The Pentagon launched an investigation run by a recently retired Army lieutenant colonel. Greg Edgreen has never spoken publicly until now. 

Scott Pelley: Are we being attacked?

Greg Edgreen: My personal opinion, yes.

Scott Pelley: By whom?

Greg Edgreen: Russia.

Greg Edgreen ran the investigation for the Defense Intelligence Agency. He would not discuss classified information but he described his team’s work from 2021 to 2023.

Greg Edgreen: We were collecting a large body of data, ranging from signals intelligence, human intelligence, open-source reporting. Anything regarding the internet, travel records, financial records, you name it. Unfortunately I can’t get into specifics, based on the classification. But I can tell you at a very early stage, I started to focus on Moscow.

Scott Pelley: Can you tell me about the patterns you began to see?

Greg Edgreen: One of the things I started to notice was the caliber of our officer that was being impacted. This wasn’t happening to our worst or our middle-range officers. This was happening to our top 5%, 10% performing officers across the Defense Intelligence Agency. And consistently there was a Russia nexus. There was some angle where they had worked against Russia, focused on Russia, and done extremely well. 

Scott Pelley: What has been the impact on American national security?

Greg Edgreen: The impact has been that the intelligence officers and our diplomats working abroad are being removed from their posts with traumatic brain injuries. They’re being neutralized.

Greg Edgreen and Scott Pelley
Greg Edgreen and Scott Pelley

60 Minutes


Tonight, we’re reporting for the first time, an incident at last year’s NATO summit in Lithuania—a meeting that focused largely on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and was attended by President Biden. Multiple sources tell us that a senior official of the Department of Defense was struck by the symptoms and sought medical treatment. We told Greg Edgreen what we’d learned.

Greg Edgreen: It tells me that there are no barriers on what Moscow will do, on who they will attack, and that if we don’t face this head on, the problem is going to get worse.

The problem first appeared in public in 2016. U.S. officials reported being hurt in Cuba and the incidents became known as Havana Syndrome. But we have learned it started two years earlier when at least four Americans reported symptoms in Frankfurt, Germany. There is also evidence of what could be revenge attacks. For example, in 2014, three CIA officers were stationed in Ukraine, Vladimir Putin’s obsession. 2014 was the year that a popular revolt overthrew Putin’s preferred leader. Later, those CIA officers went on to other assignments and reported being hit, one in Uzbekistan, one in Vietnam, and the third officer’s family was hit in London.

If it is Russia, investigative reporter Christo Grozev believes he knows who’s involved. In 2018, Grozev was the first to discover the existence of a top secret Russian intelligence unit which goes by a number, 29155.

Christo Grozev: These are people who are trained to be versatile assassins and sabotage operators. They are trained in countersurveillance, they are trained in explosives, they’re trained to be using poison, and technology equipment to actually inflict pain or damage to the targets.

Grozev works with our collaborators on this report, a magazine called The Insider and Germany’s Der Spiegel. he has a long track record uncovering Russian documents. And Grozev says he found one that may link 29155 to a directed energy weapon. 

Christo Grozev: And when I saw it, I literally had tears in my eyes, because it was spelling out what they had been doing.

It’s a piece of accounting. An officer of 29155 received a bonus for work on quote, “potential capabilities of non-lethal acoustic weapons…” 

Christo Grozev: Which told us that this particular unit had been engaged with somewhere, somehow, empirical tests of a directed energy unit.

Scott Pelley: There it is, written down in black and white. 

Christo Grozev: It’s the closest to a receipt you can have for this. 

Christo Grozev
Christo Grozev

60 Minutes


We’ve also found that Russia’s 29155 may have been present in Tbilisi, Georgia when Americans reported incidents there. 

Scott Pelley: Do you believe that you were attacked?

Anonymous: Absolutely.

She asked us to withhold her name for her safety. She’s the wife of a Justice Department official who was with the embassy in Tbilisi. She’s a nurse with a Ph.D. in anesthesiology. On Oct. 7, 2021, she says that she was in her laundry room when she was blindsided by a sound.

Anonymous: As I’m reaching into the dryer– I am completely consumed by a piercing sound that I can only describe as when you listen to a movie and the main character is also consumed by the sound after a bomb goes off. That is similar to the sound that I heard. And it just pierced my ears, came in my left side, felt like it came through the window, into my left ear. I immediately felt fullness in my head, and just a piercing headache. And when I realized that I needed to get out of the laundry room, I left the room, and went into our bedroom next door, and projectile vomited in our bathroom 

We have learned that hers was the second incident that week. Sources tell us, earlier, in the neighborhood, a U.S. official, their spouse and child were hit. We have also learned of a phone call that was intercepted nearby. A man says in Russian, “Is it supposed to have blinking green lights?” and “Should I leave it on all night.” We have no idea what he was talking about but, the next day, the incidents began. 

Sources tell us that an investigation centered on this Russian, Albert Averyanov. His name, on travel manifests and phone records, appears alongside known members of Unit 29155. He is also the son of the commander.

Christo Grozev: He was groomed to become a member of the unit since he was 16. His number is in the phone books of all members of the unit. Clearly, he’s more than just the son of the boss. He’s a colleague of these people.

Grozev found Albert Averyanov’s phone was turned off during the Tbilisi incidents but our sources say there’s evidence someone in Tbilisi logged into Averyanov’s personal email during this time. Most likely, Grozev believes, Averyanov himself—placing him in the city.

Christo Grozev: We believe members of Unit 29155 were there in order to facilitate, supervise, or maybe even personally implement attacks on American diplomats, on American government officials, using an acoustic weapon.

Scott Pelley: After you were able to get out of the laundry room, call your husband, what did you do then?

Anonymous: I went downstairs. I first looked on our security camera, which is right beside our front door, to see if anyone was outside. There was a vehicle right outside of our gate. I took a photo of that vehicle and noticed that it was not a vehicle that I recognized. And I went outside. 

Scott Pelley: Did you see anyone around the vehicle?

Anonymous: I did.

Scott Pelley: We sent you a photograph of Albert Averyanov. And this is the picture that we sent you.

Anonymous: You did.

Scott Pelley: And I wonder if that looks anything like the man you saw outside your home.

Anonymous: It absolutely does. And when I received this photo, I had a visceral reaction. It made me feel sick. I cannot absolutely say for certainty that it is this man, but I can tell you that even to this day, looking at him makes me feel that same visceral reaction. And I can absolutely say that this looks like the man that I saw in the street.

This 40-year-old wife and mother is among the most severely injured people we have met. 

Anonymous: My headaches and brain fog continued. Later on into that weekend, I started having trouble walking down the stairs, specifically at night. I had trouble finding the steps to get down the stairs. So my coordination and vestibular system started just really falling apart. 

She was medically evacuated. And now doctors say she has holes in her inner ear canals—the vestibular system that creates the sense of balance. Two surgeries put metal plates in her skull. Another surgery is likely. 

Anonymous: It’s devastating. It’s absolutely devastating.

Despite experiences like hers, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said last year it’s “very unlikely a foreign adversary is responsible.” But the DNI also acknowledged that some intelligence agencies had only “low” or “moderate” confidence in that assessment. This month, the National Institutes of Health reported results of brain scans. NIH said there’s no evidence of physical damage. but the medical science of so-called anomalous health incidents remains vigorously debated. For its part, the Director of National Intelligence says the symptoms probably result from “… preexisting conditions, conventional illnesses, and environmental factors.” Attorney Mark Zaid represents more than two dozen ahi clients.

Scott Pelley: What do you make of the intelligence community assessment? 

Mark Zaid: So I’ve had access to classified information relating to AHI. I can’t reveal it. I wouldn’t reveal it. I will tell you that I don’t believe it to be the entire story, and I know of information that undermines or contradicts what they are saying publicly. 

Scott Pelley: Are you saying that the government wants to cover this up?

Mark Zaid: There is, in my view, without a doubt, evidence of a cover up. Now, some of that cover up is not necessarily that, oh, we found a weapon and we don’t want anybody to know about it. What I’ve seen more so is we see lines of inquiry that would take us potentially to answers we don’t want to have to deal with, so we’re not going to explore any of those avenues. 

Greg Edgreen
Greg Edgreen

60 Minutes


Greg Edgreen: “You know, if my mother had seen what I saw, she would say, ‘It’s the Russians, stupid.'”

Greg Edgreen who ran the military investigation told us he had the Pentagon’s support but, in the Trump, and Biden administrations, he says, the bar for proof was set impossibly high. 

Greg Edgreen: I think it was set so high because we did not, as a country, and a government, want to face some very hard truths.

Scott Pelley: And what are those?

Greg Edgreen: Can we secure America? Are these massive counterintelligence failures? Can we protect American soil and our people on American soil? Are we being attacked? And if we’re being attacked, is that an act of war?

After what he learned in his classified investigation, Greg Edgreen retired from the Army to start a company to help the victims. He hopes to channel government contracts into treatment programs. 

As with all spy stories, much is classified and what remains is circumstantial. None of the witnesses tonight wanted to speak. Some fear for their families. But all felt compelled to shine a light on what they see as a war of shadows –a war America may not be winning.

Christo Grozev: If this is what we’ve seen with the hundreds of cases of Anomalous Health Incidents, I can assure that this has become probably Putin’s biggest victory. In his own mind this has been Russia’s biggest victory against the West. 

Scott Pelley: In terms of the long-term, would you consider this to be life-altering?

Anonymous: Absolutely life-altering. For our whole family. 

“Targeting Americans” statements

Prior to 60 Minutes’ March 31, 2024, broadcast which featured correspondent Scott Pelley’s report on Havana Syndrome, we reached out to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the White House, and the FBI for comments on our story, “Targeting Americans.”

They responded to 60 Minutes with the following statements:

Office of the Director of National Intelligence:

“We continue to closely examine anomalous health incidents (AHIs), particularly in areas we have identified as requiring additional research and analysis. Most IC agencies have concluded that it is very unlikely a foreign adversary is responsible for the reported AHIs. IC agencies have varying confidence levels because we still have gaps given the challenges collecting on foreign adversaries—as we do on many issues involving them. As part of its review, the IC identified critical assumptions surrounding the initial AHIs reported in Cuba from 2016 to 2018, which framed the IC’s understanding of this phenomenon, but were not borne out by subsequent medical and technical analysis. In light of this and the evidence that points away from a foreign adversary, causal mechanism, or unique syndromes linked to AHIs, IC agencies assess those symptoms reported by U.S. personnel probably were the result of factors that did not involve a foreign adversary. These findings do not call into question the very real experiences and symptoms that our colleagues and their family members have reported. We continue to prioritize our work on such incidents, allocating resources and expertise across the government, pursuing multiple lines of inquiry and seeking information to fill the gaps we have identified.”

White House:

“At the start of the Biden-Harris Administration and again following the 2023 Intelligence Community assessment, the White House has directed departments and agencies across the federal government to prioritize investigations into the cause of AHIs and to examine reports thoroughly; to ensure that U.S. Government personnel and their families who report AHIs receive the support and timely access to medical care that they need; and to take reports of AHIs seriously and treat personnel with respect and compassion. The Biden-Harris administration continues to emphasize the importance of prioritizing efforts to comprehensively examine the effects and potential causes of AHIs.”

FBI:

“The issue of Anomalous Health Incidents is a top priority for the FBI, as the protection, health and well-being of our employees and colleagues across the federal government is paramount. We will continue to work alongside our partners in the intelligence community as part of the interagency effort to determine how we can best protect our personnel. The FBI takes all U.S. government personnel who report symptoms seriously. In keeping with this practice, the FBI has messaged its workforce on how to respond if they experience an AHI, how to report an incident, and where they can receive medical evaluations for symptoms or persistent effects.

Produced by Oriana Zill de Granados and Michael Rey. Associate producers: Emily Gordon, Kit Ramgopal and Jamie Woods. Broadcast Associate: Michelle Karim. Edited by Michael Mongulla and Joe Schanzer.



Source link

Men’s NCAA Final Four is set with 11th seed N.C. State’s shocking upset of Duke



The Men’s NCAA Final Four is set.

In a shocking Elite Eight upset, 11th-seeded N.C. State powered through to beat their longtime rivals, the Duke Blue Devils, 76 to 64, and paving the way to their first Final Four appearance since 1983.

An 11th-seed is the lowest seeded team to ever make the Final Four, tying the record with LSU (1986), George Mason (2006), VCU (2011), Loyola Chicago (2018) and UCLA (2021), according to the NCAA.

With just under seven minutes left in the second half, N.C. State pulled away with a double-digit lead, sealing the deal for the Wolfpack and kissing the Blue Devils’ chances at yet another Final Four appearance goodbye.

Duke didn’t have another lead for the rest of the game.

The Wolfpack will face the Purdue Boilermakers — a No. 1-seed — on Saturday at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona.

Also facing off on Saturday will be the No. 1 seed UConn Huskies and the fourth-seeded Alabama Crimson Tide.

The winners of each of those games will head to the NCAA Championship game, which is set for April 8, also at State Farm Stadium.

Duke was favored to win Sunday’s matchup by 6.5 points, according to Bet MGM, but ended up falling to N.C. State by 12 points.

As for the rest of the Final Four teams, UConn showed their dominance on the court against Illinois, beating the fighting Illini 77-52 on Saturday.

Also Saturday, Alabama secured an 89-82 win over Clemson to advance to the next round.

And Purdue narrowly held on to a lead in a back-and-forth battle against Tennessee earlier on Sunday, beating them 72-66.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.





Source link

New $20 minimum wage for fast food workers in California set to start Monday



LIVERMORE, Calif. — Most fast food workers in California will be paid at least $20 an hour beginning Monday when a new law is scheduled to kick in, giving more financial security to a historically low-paying profession while threatening to raise prices in a state already known for its high cost of living.

Democrats in the state Legislature passed the law last year in part as an acknowledgement that many of the more than 500,000 people who work in fast food restaurants are not teenagers earning some spending money, but adults working to support their families.

That includes immigrants like Ingrid Vilorio, who said she started working at a McDonald’s shortly after arriving in the United States in 2019. Fast food was her full-time job until last year. Now, she works about eight hours per week at a Jack in the Box while working other jobs.

“The $20 raise is great. I wish this would have come sooner,” Vilorio said through a translator. “Because I would not have been looking for so many other jobs in different places.”

The law was supported by the trade association representing fast food franchise owners. But since it passed, many franchise owners have bemoaned the impact the law is having on them, especially during California’s slowing economy.

Alex Johnson owns 10 Auntie Anne’s Pretzels and Cinnabon restaurants in the San Francisco Bay Area. He said sales have slowed in 2024, prompting him to lay off his office staff and rely on his parents to help with payroll and human resources.

Increasing his employees’ wages will cost Johnson about $470,000 each year. He will have to raise prices anywhere from 5% to 15% at his stores, and is no longer hiring or seeking to open new locations in California, he said.

“I try to do right by my employees. I pay them as much as I can. But this law is really hitting our operations hard,” Johnson said.

“I have to consider selling and even closing my business,” he said. “The profit margin has become too slim when you factor in all the other expenses that are also going up.”

Over the past decade, California has doubled its minimum wage for most workers to $16 per hour. A big concern over that time was whether the increase would cause some workers to lose their jobs as employers’ expenses increased.

Instead, data showed wages went up and employment did not fall, said Michael Reich, a labor economics professor at the University of California-Berkeley.

“I was surprised at how little, or how difficult it was to find disemployment effects. If anything, we find positive employment effects,” Reich said.

Plus, Reich said while the statewide minimum wage is $16 per hour, many of the state’s larger cities have their own minimum wage laws setting the rate higher than that. For many fast food restaurants, this means the jump to $20 per hour will be smaller.

The law reflected a carefully crafted compromise between the fast food industry and labor unions, which had been fighting over wages, benefits and legal liabilities for close to two years. The law originated during private negotiations between unions and the industry, including the unusual step of signing confidentiality agreements.

The law applies to restaurants offering limited or no table service and which are part of a national chain with at least 60 establishments nationwide. Restaurants operating inside a grocery establishment are exempt, as are restaurants producing and selling bread as a stand-alone menu item.

At first, it appeared the bread exemption applied to Panera Bread restaurants. Bloomberg News reported the change would benefit Greg Flynn, a wealthy campaign donor to Newsom. But the Newsom administration said the wage increase law does apply to Panera Bread because the restaurant does not make dough on-site. Also, Flynn has announced he would pay his workers at least $20 per hour.



Source link

California set to hike wages for fast-food workers to industry-leading $20 per hour


Fast food wage increase goes into effect next week


Fast food wage increase goes into effect next week

02:30

Starting Monday, most California fast-food workers will earn at least $20 an hour — the highest minimum wage across the U.S. restaurant industry. Yet the pay hike is sparking furious debate, with some restaurant owners warning of job losses and higher prices for customers, while labor advocates tout the benefits of higher wages.

The new law, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom last fall, takes effect on April 1, requiring that fast-food chains with at least 60 locations nationwide pay workers at least $20 an hour. The means the state’s 553,000 fast-food workers will earn more than the state’s $16 minimum wage for all other industries. 

The new baseline wage comes as the fast-food industry is seeing booming earnings, with big chains like McDonald’s enjoying strong revenue growth and wider profit margins in recent years. That’s partly due to menu prices that have far outpaced inflation, with fast-food costs surging 47% over the past decade, compared with an average of 29% for all other prices, according to a new analysis from the Roosevelt Institute, a nonpartisan think tank.

“Prices have been so much higher than operating costs over the last decade that these companies could just absorb higher operating costs,” Roosevelt Institute labor expert Alí Bustamante, a co-author of the analysis, told CBS MoneyWatch. “This is about raising the floor and making sure that $20 being the new minimum wage puts workers on a better economic footing to cover their household needs.”

Prior to the April 1 pay hike, the highest paid fast-food workers in the U.S. were in Washington State, which has a minimum wage of $16.28 per hour.

What’s on the menu — price hikes

Some California restaurant owners say that higher labor costs will lead to higher prices for customers, and even curb hiring. One California franchisee told CBS MoneyWatch that while major fast-food chains might be able to absorb such costs, smaller operators will struggle. 

“We aren’t these big corporations with deep pockets — we’re not Wall Street, we are Main Street,” said Alex Johnson, who owns 10 franchised restaurants in the San Francisco area, including Auntie Anne’s and Cinnabons locations. 

Johnson’s company is subject to the new wage law because the parent franchisors operate more than 60 restaurants across the U.S.

alexjohnson-6a.jpg
Alex Johnson, who owns 10 chain locations in the San Francisco area, said he may need to raise prices this year to offset the new $20 minimum wage for fast-food workers.

Alex Johnson


Johnson said the wage hike comes at a time when his restaurants are already coping with softer sales, which he attributes to consumers sapped by two years of elevated inflation and the high cost of living in California. To offset the new $20 minimum wage, Johnson expects to increase prices about 10% this year, which he plans to do in two smaller increments.  

“You couldn’t think of a worse time to raise prices,” he said. 

The typical California restaurant is facing an additional expense of $250,000 annually to cover the April 1 wage hike, according to the Save Local Restaurants coalition, citing data from a McDonald’s owner association. The group represents restaurant owners. 

“We know we have to take something at a significant increase when you talk about a 20%-ish increase in wages,” Chipotle Chief Financial Officer Jack Hartung said on an earnings call last month about the California law.

Chipotle’s 3,400 locations across the U.S. could see a 1% increase in prices to compensate, he added. 

Starbucks told the Los Angeles Times it plans to offset the higher wages by boosting prices, among other measures.

“There isn’t a quick-service restaurant owner in California who can easily shoulder an immediate 25% wage increase for all their employees,” Mike Whatley, vice president of state affairs and grassroots advocacy for the National Restaurant Association, a trade organization for the industry, told CBS MoneyWatch.

He added, “Consumers are starting to see this in menu prices, and employees across the state are starting to feel it, too.”


Panera franchise owner to raise minimum wage after accusations of special treatment by Gov. Newsom

02:48

Some critics of the wage law said the higher costs will lead to layoffs and curb hiring. Already, some Pizza Hut locations in California are planning to cut jobs, according to state labor filings. Pizza Hut didn’t immediately return a request for comment.

Johnson noted that he’s not hiring at the moment and plans to introduce more automation, such as ordering kiosks, to reduce his need for human labor. He’s also thinking about selling his franchise locations in California to focus on restaurants in Nevada, where costs are lower. 

“I work really hard to treat employees fairly, but there are consequences to these actions that increase costs — we’re not hiring anymore, and I’m contemplating closing or selling my restaurants,” Johnson added. “It’s a sad time.”

“An economy that works for all”

Labor advocates argue the new law will help fast-food workers, who earn an average of $16.60 an hour, or just over $34,000 per year, according to government data. That’s below the poverty line for a family of four in California. 

The higher pay is “a transformational step toward an economy that works for all, not just billionaires,” Tia Orr, executive director of the Service Employees International Union California, a labor group that pushed for the law, told the Associated Press. 

When Newsom signed the law last year, he dismissed the notion that fast-food jobs are primarily held by teenagers, underscoring that many households depend on the jobs for income. The average age of fast-food workers is about 26, according to Business Insider. 

Meanwhile, dozens of states and localities have hiked their minimum wages during the past several years, even as the federal baseline remains at $7.25 an hour — a rate that has remained frozen since 2009. Some economic research has found that higher wages don’t lead to job losses, while having the upside of providing financial security to workers and boosting consumer spending, which stimulates broader economic growth. 

California businesses have had to digest multiple wage hikes during the past several years, yet continued to operate, experts point out.

“You’ve experienced minimum wage hikes in California for over 10 years now,” Bustamante said. “You don’t open up a business in California without expecting minimum wage increases.”



Source link

Walmart is practically giving away this bestselling 4-piece rattan patio furniture set for $190


walmart-4-piece-rattan-patio-set-hero.jpg

Walmart


Want to level up your outdoor living space this spring? Head on over to Walmart — the Walmart website that is — because we found a really fantastic deal on a top-rated rattan patio furniture set for $190. CBS Essentials readers are going crazy for it: It’s our bestselling patio set.

Right now you can get this 4.2-star rated patio set by Costway that includes two single chairs with cushions (23.5” x 25” x 31”), a loveseat with a cushion (43.5” x 25”x 31”) and a tempered glass top coffee table (35” x 18” x 17.5”) that supports up to 165 pounds. The chairs support up to 400 pounds. The washable cushions are available in white, turquoise, red, navy and beige.

“This patio furniture looks great and is very comfortable,” a Walmart reviewer said. “All the pieces and hardware were clearly marked and the assembly instructions were easy to follow. Very well satisfied.”

Originally priced at $369, you can get this four-piece patio furniture set at Walmart for just $190.

Looking for more outdoor deals? Walmart has plenty of discounted outdoor furniture pieces and patio sets to shop right now. Tap the button below to see all the deals.


More great patio furniture deals at Walmart

Walmart is your go-to store for inexpensive patio furniture this spring. Check out these curated Walmart patio furniture finds, with options for every size of porch or deck.

Rattan eight-piece outdoor furniture set: Save $134

walmart-8-piece-patio-set.jpg

Walmart


Need more seating for your guests this spring and summer? Walmart has you covered with this eight-piece outdoor furniture set that includes four chairs, two loveseats, two tempered glass coffee tables and washable cushions.

Says one Walmart reviewer about the 4-star-rated rattan patio set: “I love the set, I use it almost every morning. The assembly was easy and the seating is comfortable. I bought the double set, one for under my carport, one for the garden. 

Save on this bestselling outdoor patio furniture set at Walmart now. It’s available in six colors, ranging from turquoise to gray.


Rattan outdoor patio daybed: Save $169  

costway-outdoor-patio-furniture-daybed.jpg

Walmart


Lounge all spring and summer on this rattan outdoor patio daybed (61″ x 52″ x 27.5″). The washable cushions are available in five colors. Supports up to 800 pounds. Prices vary by color, though most are on sale.

“This outdoor daybed is exactly as described and pictured,” said a Walmart reviewer. “Looked for a year to find an affordable one. This was it!”


Rattan 3-piece outdoor furniture set: Save up to 64%

three-piece-walmart-patio-set-165.jpg

Walmart


One of the best deals at Walmart is on this three-piece rattan set. All eight colorways are available for $160, a savings of up to 64%.

Perfect for small spaces, this patio furniture set includes two single chairs (26.5″ x 26.5″ x 30″) and a glass-top coffee table (19.5″ x 19.5″ x 19.5″). The cushion covers are zippered for easy removal and washing. The chairs support up to 390 pounds.

“Really nice set for the price,” a Walmart reviewer says about this 4.2-star patio set.


Three-piece sectional patio furniture set: Save $230

Orange-Casual Patio Furniture Set

Walmart


This modular, rattan patio set looks like it costs more than just $300. It comes with a sectional and a coffee table. Choose from three colors and rearrange the sofa pieces to your liking. Rated 4.3 stars.

“This set is a steal for the price!” one Walmart reviewer says. “Good quality, expensive look, perfect size set. Solid plastic wicker and nice cushions.”

Price varies by color.




Source link

Walmart is practically giving away this bestselling 4-piece rattan patio furniture set for $190


walmart-4-piece-rattan-patio-set-hero.jpg

Walmart


Want to level up your outdoor living space this spring? Head on over to Walmart — the Walmart website that is — because we found a really fantastic deal on a top-rated rattan patio furniture set for $190. CBS Essentials readers are going crazy for it: It’s our bestselling patio set.

Right now you can get this 4.2-star rated patio set by Costway that includes two single chairs with cushions (23.5” x 25” x 31”), a loveseat with a cushion (43.5” x 25”x 31”) and a tempered glass top coffee table (35” x 18” x 17.5”) that supports up to 165 pounds. The chairs support up to 400 pounds. The washable cushions are available in white, turquoise, red, navy and beige.

“This patio furniture looks great and is very comfortable,” a Walmart reviewer said. “All the pieces and hardware were clearly marked and the assembly instructions were easy to follow. Very well satisfied.”

Originally priced at $369, you can get this four-piece patio furniture set at Walmart for just $190.

Looking for more outdoor deals? Walmart has plenty of discounted outdoor furniture pieces and patio sets to shop right now. Tap the button below to see all the deals.


More great patio furniture deals at Walmart

Walmart is your go-to store for inexpensive patio furniture this spring. Check out these curated Walmart patio furniture finds, with options for every size of porch or deck.

Rattan eight-piece outdoor furniture set: Save $134

walmart-8-piece-patio-set.jpg

Walmart


Need more seating for your guests this spring and summer? Walmart has you covered with this eight-piece outdoor furniture set that includes four chairs, two loveseats, two tempered glass coffee tables and washable cushions.

Says one Walmart reviewer about the 4-star-rated rattan patio set: “I love the set, I use it almost every morning. The assembly was easy and the seating is comfortable. I bought the double set, one for under my carport, one for the garden. 

Save on this bestselling outdoor patio furniture set at Walmart now. It’s available in six colors, ranging from turquoise to gray.


Rattan outdoor patio daybed: Save $169  

costway-outdoor-patio-furniture-daybed.jpg

Walmart


Lounge all spring and summer on this rattan outdoor patio daybed (61″ x 52″ x 27.5″). The washable cushions are available in five colors. Supports up to 800 pounds. Prices vary by color, though most are on sale.

“This outdoor daybed is exactly as described and pictured,” said a Walmart reviewer. “Looked for a year to find an affordable one. This was it!”


Rattan 3-piece outdoor furniture set: Save up to 64%

three-piece-walmart-patio-set-165.jpg

Walmart


One of the best deals at Walmart is on this three-piece rattan set. All eight colorways are available for $160, a savings of up to 64%.

Perfect for small spaces, this patio furniture set includes two single chairs (26.5″ x 26.5″ x 30″) and a glass-top coffee table (19.5″ x 19.5″ x 19.5″). The cushion covers are zippered for easy removal and washing. The chairs support up to 390 pounds.

“Really nice set for the price,” a Walmart reviewer says about this 4.2-star patio set.


Three-piece sectional patio furniture set: Save $230

Orange-Casual Patio Furniture Set

Walmart


This modular, rattan patio set looks like it costs more than just $300. It comes with a sectional and a coffee table. Choose from three colors and rearrange the sofa pieces to your liking. Rated 4.3 stars.

“This set is a steal for the price!” one Walmart reviewer says. “Good quality, expensive look, perfect size set. Solid plastic wicker and nice cushions.”

Price varies by color.




Source link

Former President Trump’s bond reduced in fraud case, date set for “hush money” criminal trial


Former President Trump’s bond reduced in fraud case, date set for “hush money” criminal trial – CBS News

Watch CBS News


On Monday, a judge agreed to reduce Donald Trump’s bond from $464 million to $175 million at a court hearing for his New York civil fraud case. It was a busy day for the former president, as a date was also set for his criminal “hush money” trial. It is scheduled to begin April 15 after a judge rejected Trump’s bid to delay the trial.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Opposition’s Bassirou Diomaye Faye set to win


Senegal’s ruling coalition candidate Amadou Ba has called the opposition’s Bassirou Diomaye Faye to concede victory in Sunday’s presidential election, a government official said.

Unofficial results showed that Mr Faye had a strong lead over Mr Ba.

Mr Faye had been in prison 10 days before the vote and campaigned on the promise of radical change.

Official results are expected in the coming days from the election which was originally due last month.

The vote followed months of political turmoil in one of Africa’s most stable democracies, after outgoing President Macky Sall tried to postpone the election until December.

Several of the other 15 candidates had already conceded.

President Sall has also congratulated Mr Faye and said that it was a win for the people of Senegal.

Mr Faye is a senior member of the Pastef party, led by Ousmane Sonko, the popular figure who many thought would succeed Mr Sall.

But Mr Sonko was disqualified from the election because of a defamation conviction, which he said was politically motivated. Mr Sonko backed Mr Faye’s bid for the presidency.

The first set of results announced on television overnight showing that Mr Faye had won a majority of the votes counted up to that point, triggered street celebrations in the capital, Dakar.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.



Source link

UK government set to link China government-affiliated hackers to a cyberattack on election watchdog


LONDON (AP) — Britain’s government is expected to blame a string of cyberattacks targeting the U.K.’s election watchdog and lawmakers on hackers linked to the Chinese government,

Officials are expected to announce Monday measures against cyber organizations and individuals affiliated with the Chinese government for an attack that may have gained access to information on tens of millions of U.K. voters held by the Electoral Commission, as well as cyberattacks targeting lawmakers who have been outspoken about the China threat.

The Electoral Commission said in August that it identified a cyberattack on its system in October 2022, though it added that “hostile actors” had first been able to access its servers since 2021.

At the time, the watchdog said the data included the names and addresses of registered voters. But it added that much of the information was already in the public domain, and that possessing such information was unlikely to influence election results.

Separately, three lawmakers, including former Conservative Party leader Iain Duncan Smith and a member of the House of Lords, were reportedly called to a briefing by Parliament’s security director Monday over the cyberattacks.

The four politicians are members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, an international pressure group focused on countering Beijing’s growing influence and calling out alleged rights abuses by the Chinese government.

Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden is expected to give details in Parliament later Monday.

Ahead of that announcement, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak reiterated that China is “behaving in an increasingly assertive way abroad” and is “the greatest state-based threat to our economic security.”

“It’s right that we take measures to protect ourselves, which is what we are doing,” he said, without providing details.

Responding to the reports, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said countries should base their claims on evidence rather than “smear” others without factual basis.

“Cybersecurity issues should not be politicized,” ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said. “We hope all parties will stop spreading false information, take a responsible attitude, and work together to maintain peace and security in cyberspace.”



Source link

Judge expected to set trial start date in Trump’s hush money case


Judge Juan Merchan is expected at Monday’s hearing to set a trial start date in the New York hush money case against former President Donald Trump.

Monday’s hearing, scheduled for 10 a.m. ET, comes after the trial was postponed until at least mid-April. The trial was originally slated to begin on Monday, but Merchan delayed the start date by 30 days after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the hush money case against Trump, said he did not oppose Trump’s request for a delay.

But Bragg’s office last week urged Merchan not to delay the trial further, arguing that fewer than 300 out of 170,000 documents turned over by federal prosecutors are relevant to Trump’s criminal defense.

Trump’s lawyers blamed Bragg’s office for not obtaining the documents sooner and requested Merchan dismiss the charges. The DA’s office pushed back, calling the focus on the documents release a “red herring.”

Merchan scheduled the hearing Monday to discuss document production in the case after Trump’s lawyers filed a motion on the matter. Merchan at the time said he would set a new trial date “if necessary” upon ruling on the motion by Trump’s lawyers.

Trump is expected to be in court on Monday.

The DA’s case alleged that Trump falsified business records in connection to $130,000 in hush money payments that his former lawyer Michael Cohen paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels on his behalf ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Daniels claimed she had an affair with Trump in 2006, after he had already married his wife, Melania Trump.

Trump pleaded not guilty to the charges against him and denied that he slept with Daniels. He did, however, say he repaid Cohen.

Merchan last week rejected Trump’s request to prevent Cohen and Daniels from testifying in the hush money case. Trump’s lawyers had argued in a court filing last month that Cohen and Daniels should be barred from testifying because they are “liars.” 

Cohen pleaded guilty in 2018 to multiple criminal charges, including issuing secret payments to women who claimed they’d had affairs with Trump, making false claims to Congress about the then-president’s business dealings with Russia and failing to report millions of dollars in income.

The hush money case is among the four indictments Trump faces as he pursues another presidential bid. The hearing coincides with a Monday deadline for Trump to pay more than a $454 million bond in New York Judge Arthur Engoron’s ruling in his state civil fraud trial. Trump has appealed the ruling and threatened to also challenge it “all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.”



Source link