State Department official resigns; most Americans oppose Israel’s Gaza war, new poll finds


‘Moving the needle’

But despite this growing clash between the two governments, some feel the United States has done too little to press its ally to change course in Gaza.

Sheline, who first shared her account with The Washington Post, was recruited to join the State Department as a foreign affairs officer in the bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor as part of an Arabic language fellowship connected to her PhD program — and she quit last week just halfway into her two-year contract.

Sheline said that U.S. policy toward Israel had made her job “almost impossible,” whether it was members of civil society simply not wanting to engage with U.S. officials over the country’s backing of Israel or fearing that engagement with the U.S. government would put them at greater risk.

Sheline said she tried to raise her concerns internally, signing onto dissent cables and speaking with her supervisors, as well as in open forums, but to no avail.

“I personally was not expecting to shape policy but it became clear that even moving the needle in a tiny way from the inside just wasn’t going to work,” she said.

State Department Spokesperson Matt Miller has acknowledged a diversity of internal views on the war in Gaza, but he said that while Blinken welcomes employees to “speak up and challenge his thinking,” that doesn’t mean it will lead to a shift in U.S. policy.

Miller told reporters Wednesday that was ultimately up to Biden and senior leaders in his administration.

Sheline is the second State Department official to public resign citing U.S. policy toward Israel since the war began nearly six months ago after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks, in which Israeli officials say 1,200 people were killed and around 260 others were taken hostage, with more than 100 still held captive in Gaza.

In October, veteran State Department official Josh Paul left his post with the agency’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs after more than a decade, citing the “blind support” of the U.S. for Israel.

Sheline’s decision to follow suit came as a Gallup poll released Wednesday found that growing numbers of Americans now oppose Israel’s military action in Gaza, an apparent shift in U.S. views.

The poll, conducted between March 1 and 20, found that 55% of respondents said they disapprove of Israel’s actions in Gaza, compared with 45% who expressed disapproval in November.

The share of those in favor of Israel’s actions fell from 50% in November to 36% in March, while the percentage of those who said they had no stance rose from 4% to 9%.

The poll, which surveyed 1,016 adults living across all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. 

It was carried out before the U.N. Security Council on Monday passed its resolution calling for a cease-fire for the rest of the month of Ramadan, which ends April 9.

The U.S. allowed the resolution to pass, in a change of approach.

Sheline said she was concerned that upholding the rule of law had become a political consideration for the administration, which was elected in part on a promise to reestablish U.S. leadership on everything from human rights to international institutions to climate change.

“I continue to be horrified at the largely unconditional support and providing a steady stream of weapons to Israel is considered more important than all of these other extremely significant issues,” Sheline said.

Chantal Da Silva reported from Tel Aviv, and Abigail Williams from Washington.



Source link

When is the poll and what is at stake for the ANC?


South Africa is heading for a general election in late May, with some polls suggesting the governing African National Congress (ANC) could get less than 50% of the vote for the first time in 30 years.

Mounting criticism of the party that led the fight against apartheid under the late Nelson Mandela has chipped away at its support, raising the possibility of a coalition government.

When is South Africa’s election?

On 29 May, nearly 28 million South African registered voters have the chance to elect representatives to the national and provincial parliaments.

It will be the country’s seventh democratic general election.

They have taken place every five years since 1994, when white-minority rule ended and the ANC came to power.

What is at stake for the ANC and what are its policies?

The ANC, now led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, is under growing pressure.

Stubbornly high unemployment, which hit 32% last year, persistent economic inequalities, corruption allegations and frequent power cuts have reduced its popularity.

High levels of violent crime – on average 130 rapes and 80 murders a day in the last three months of 2023 – have also dented confidence in the authorities.

But the ANC says it is working to fix these problems.

And it is urging people not to throw away gains made since the end of apartheid. The party says poverty levels have fallen, a greater proportion of South Africans live in decent homes and access to healthcare has improved.

The ANC has promised to create millions more jobs over the next five years, to boost investment, support the private sector and end corruption.

What are the DA and EFF opposition parties offering?

The main opposition Democratic Alliance (DA) says the “country is in crisis”.

It wants to liberalise the economy, including a move towards greater privatisation.

It has pledged to create two million new jobs, end power cuts and “halve the rate of violent crime”.

Party supporters during the DA (Democratic Alliance) general election manifesto launch rally held at the Union Buildings, Pretoria, South Africa, 17 February 2024

The DA says it can save South Africa

To address unemployment and inequality, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) – the third largest party in parliament – has radical economic solutions.

The party argues that the ANC has not redressed the racial economic imbalances of apartheid. It plans to redistribute land to the less well off.

The EFF also wants to nationalise mines, banks and other key parts of the economy, arguing that the wealth of the country would then be used to benefit the majority of the population.

What about Jacob Zuma and the MK party?

Disgruntled former President Jacob Zuma – who was ousted by Mr Ramaphosa amid corruption allegations that he denies and later jailed for defying a court order – has thrown his considerable political weight behind a fresh rival to the ANC.

Former South African president Jacob Zuma speaks during his visit to the Shekainah Healing Ministries in Philippi, where he campaigns for a new party, uMkhonto We Sizwe, for the upcoming election, in Cape Town, South Africa, March 10

Ex-President Jacob Zuma has been campaigning for the MK party

The uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) party, which has taken its name from the ANC’s former armed wing, adds further unpredictability to the race. It could make a strong showing in Mr Zuma’s home province of KwaZulu-Natal.

In a brief manifesto it pledges to transform South Africa, including an aim to create five million jobs.

Who could be South Africa’s next president?

South Africans do not vote for a president.

Instead they elect the 400 members of the National Assembly, who go on to vote for a new head of state within 30 days of the general election.

EFF supporters during an Economic Freedom Fighters party manifesto launch in Durban, South Africa, on Saturday, Feb. 10, 2024

The EFF says that greater state control of the economy will create a fairer society

As a result, there are no presidential candidates as such, but each party leader fronts their national campaign and their portrait will appear on the ballot paper.

The ANC’s President Ramaphosa, the DA’s John Steenhuisen and the EFF’s Julius Malema will all feature prominently.

The leader of whichever party can muster a majority in the National Assembly after the election would be expected to become the next president.

How does the election work?

The proportion of seats that parties are allocated in the 400-member National Assembly is directly related to their share of the vote.

In 2024, independent candidates will be included for the first time.

This means that South Africans will cast three votes:

  1. National parliament: One for 200 of the seats with just political parties named on the ballot

  2. National parliament: One for the remaining 200 seats with a different ballot paper for each of the nine provinces, listing the parties in that region and independent candidates

  3. Provincial assembly: One for the independent candidates or parties in the regional legislature.

How would a coalition be formed in South Africa?

The constitution does not spell out how a coalition could be formed.

But assuming the ANC remains the largest party, smaller groupings could informally agree to support an ANC government on a vote-by-vote basis in return for some concessions.

Or, at the other end of possibilities, the ANC could enter a formal coalition with some parties, including a written agreement outlining legislative plans and the distribution of cabinet posts.

Any other party would face the same choices.

But there is also a possibility of an opposition coalition.

In a pre-election deal, a group of parties – led by the DA – has signed up to what has been called the Multi-Party Charter for South Africa. If together they get more than 50% of the seats, they have already agreed to form a coalition. The agreement does not include the EFF.

You may also be interested in:



Source link

Baseless ‘2020 poll fraud’ claims resurface ahead of S. Korea vote in April


As South Korea geared up for elections in April, social media posts shared a photo of a stack of ballot papers they misleadingly claimed was evidence of vote rigging in the country’s 2020 polls. The picture was taken by a lawyer who alleged votes cast for the Democratic Party in the city of Guri did not have any fold marks, suggesting they were fraudulently filled out. However, the Supreme Court ruled ballots without clear fold marks were not proof of fraud. A legal bid to challenge election results in Guri was dismissed.

The photo, which was shared on Facebook on March 8, 2024, shows a bundle of ballot papers.

The top one shows a vote cast for the Democratic Party’s Yun Ho-jung, who was elected member of parliament for Guri in 2020 (archived link).

Yun’s party won in a landslide and secured the most number of seats in the National Assembly.

Korean text below the picture says police must “prevent the emergence of piles of printed ballots like these during the April 10, 2024 poll”.

<span>Screenshot of the Facebook post, taken on March 15</span>

Screenshot of the Facebook post, taken on March 15

A reverse image search on Google found the photo was originally posted on Facebook by lawyer Park Joo-hyun on May 21, 2020.

“Evidence preserved from the Guri Election Commission,” he wrote in Korean.

“How come the ballot papers inside the early absentee voting envelope are so stiff? They’re as stiff as newly printed banknotes!”

He told South Korean daily Chosun Ilbo that the “stiff” early voting ballots — those that looked fresh and without apparent creases — were suspicious as voters would have to fold them in half to fit the return envelope (archived link).

Similar posts misleadingly claiming the photo was evidence of fraud have circulated online since the 2020 vote here, here and here.

Court cases

However, Korea’s Supreme Court rejected a similar argument in a case it heard alleging fraud in the 2020 elections.

The case — filed in a district in Incheon, southwest of the capital Seoul — argued ballots without fold marks should be considered forgeries.

The court ruled in July  2022 that the absence of fold marks alone did not provide evidence of irregularities (archived link).

It noted the ballots were small enough to be put in the ballot box without folding or placed in the return envelope for absentee, early voters.

Moreover, the court said it used a microscope to examine the ballots that the plaintiff claimed to have no fold marks and in fact found marks on a significant number of them.

The plaintiff was not identified in the ruling.

In addition, the election commission said in its invalid ballots guideline that unfolded ballots were considered valid unless the voter intentionally disclosed their vote (archived link).

As of March 22, 2024, no evidence of rigging in the 2020 election emerged, despite multiple cases filed in court.

According to South Korea’s election commission, 126 lawsuits sought to nullify various poll results in 2020 but no vote rigging was substantiated to date (archived link).

In Guri city, where the picture circulating online was taken, two legal bids challenged the results, a representative from the commission told AFP on March 18.

One of the bids was dropped while the court dismissed the other due to the applicant’s failure to follow proper civil procedure, the representative added.

Ballot paper

Ballot papers have “better crease recovery” compared to regular paper, the election commission representative also said.

A representative from Moorim SP — one of two paper manufacturers that supply ballot paper in South Korea — separately told AFP on March 20: “If ballots are folded, they are unfolded before being put into a sorter. If the ballot paper’s ability to recover from creasing is poor, it causes jamming and hinders the automated sorting process.”

The election commission confirmed to AFP the same type of paper will be used for ballots in the upcoming April poll.



Source link

CBS News poll finds after latest Trump indictment, many Americans see implications for democracy. For some, it’s personal


America’s response to this week’s indictment of Donald Trump is providing a window into more than just how Americans view his alleged actions per se — but also into what they think it means for democracy itself.

  • Half the nation believes Trump tried to stay in office beyond his term through illegal and unconstitutional means. 
  • To most Americans, such an effort would mean undermining democracy.
  • For them and for a majority of Americans overall, the series of indictments and ongoing investigations against Trump are seen as “defending democracy” and “upholding the rule of law.”
  • Just under a third of the country thinks Trump was trying to stay in office through legal, constitutional means — legal, in part because most of them (and including most Republicans) believe Trump’s claim that the election was illegitimate in the first place. 
  • For most Republicans, the series of indictments are also personal, seeing them as “an attack” on people like them — echoing some of Trump’s rhetoric on the campaign trail. 
  • And big majorities of Republicans think the indictments are an attempt to stop Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign.
trump-plans-after-2020.png

trump-undermining-democracy.png

Most Americans generally describe the multiple indictments Trump is now facing as “upholding the rule of law” and “defending democracy.” 

Most also think they are an effort to stop Trump’s 2024 campaign, boosted by Republicans who are very likely to think so (but this group actually includes some Democrats, too, perhaps seeing that campaign as a threat to democracy in the same way they see Trump’s actions.)

indictments-and-investigations.png

A closer look at partisan differences

There are more strong party splits over what all these indictments mean. Democrats see it as upholding the law. Republicans see it as a political move, and most Republicans see it personally as an attack on people like them, channeling some of Trump’s campaign points.

indictments-and-investigations-party.png

There are some differences within the GOP, though: it’s MAGA-identifiers who see the indictments as an attack on people like them. But nearly all Republicans feel the indictments are an attempt to stop the Trump campaign.

indictments-and-investigations-maga.png

Most independents, along with large numbers of Democrats, say that if in fact Trump was trying to overturn an election, that would be undermining democracy.

trump-undermining-democracy-party.png

Opinion here seems related to what people believe about the 2020 election. Those who think Joe Biden was not legitimately elected — mostly Republicans — tend to think Trump planned to stay in office through legal processes, and some of them think he was upholding democracy.

As has been the case since he took office, most Republicans have said they don’t think Mr. Biden was legitimately elected.

biden-legitimate-winner-party.png

Where might this go next?

Concern about an attempted overturn, and concern about political motivations, aren’t mutually exclusive. Many Americans are concerned about both when asked to weigh them. 

But for Republicans, we see overwhelming concern more about the perceived politics, just as we did when we asked about the charges and politics after the classified documents indictment.

which-concerns-you-more.png

which-concerns-you-more-party.png

There’s a group, about a fifth of the country, who aren’t entirely taking party lines in either direction, who do think Mr. Biden won legitimately, and also that Trump didn’t act illegally. Some voice concern the charges are political, but four in 10 of them say that if Trump did try to overturn the election, it would be undermining democracy. So, this would be the group to watch if, in fact, a trial gets underway, but right now, they aren’t paying as much attention to the events.


This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,145 U.S. adult residents interviewed between August 2-4, 2023. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, and education based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as past vote. The margin of error is ±2.9 points. 

Toplines



Source link

CBS News poll: In Trump indictment, many see implications for democracy


CBS News poll: In Trump indictment, many see implications for democracy – CBS News

Watch CBS News


America’s response to this week’s indictment of Donald Trump is providing a window into more than just how Americans view his alleged actions, but also into what they think it means for democracy itself. CBS News Elections and Surveys Director Anthony Salvanto has more.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Most Americans say economy is “struggling,” CBS News poll finds


Most Americans say economy is “struggling,” CBS News poll finds – CBS News

Watch CBS News


New CBS News polling shows most Americans, about 60%, still think the economy is struggling. Despite many indicators suggesting the economy is rebounding, including a rising GDP and the central bank no longer predicting a recession, only 15% of Americans see the economy as improving. CBS News executive director of elections and surveys Anthony Salvanto has more.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Poll shows people pessimistic about economy despite positive indicators


Poll shows people pessimistic about economy despite positive indicators – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Inflation has cooled in recent months and the unemployment rate remains low. Still, a CBS News poll has found that most Americans are pessimistic about the economy. Mark Strassmann takes a look.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

CBS News poll on how people are coping with the heat


How are people coping with the heat? Going outside less and turning up the juice more.

Most Americans report going outside less often and many are advising their family and kids to do the same amid soaring temperatures. And people are also upping their electricity use (and those bills) in order to cope.

Americans across all age groups and regions of the country, especially in the South, are taking these measures to deal with the heat. 

Nearly two-thirds of Americans say they have experienced unusually high temperatures in recent weeks. Though as with many things these days, even perceptions of the weather are related to partisanship.

doing-for-heat.png

In recent years, most Americans have seen climate change as an issue that needs to be addressed right now, and that has not changed. 

The recent heat has spurred added feelings of concern about climate change among those who already thought it needed addressing. It has not, however, motivated people who didn’t already see a need.

Overall, more than half of Americans do see the issue as urgent — 55% of Americans think climate change needs to be addressed now — but that figure is not up significantly from April, and is in line with much of what our polling has found in recent years.

when-address-climate.png

Climate change: heated political debate

We continue to see differences by political party on the issue of climate change as we long have. Democrats are far more likely to see it as an urgent matter and have become more concerned about it amid record-high temperatures.

Most Republicans, on the other hand, don’t think climate change needs to be addressed right away and haven’t become more concerned about it now.

whenclimateparty.png

doheatparty.png

 Partisan differences also extend to perceptions of weather. Fewer Republicans than Democrats say they have experienced unusually high temperatures recently. This is the case across regions of the country, including the South and West — areas that have faced extreme heat in recent weeks. 

Republicans who say they have had to deal with unusually hot weather are more likely than those who say they haven’t to think climate change needs to be addressed right now.

heatparty.png

This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,181 U.S. adult residents interviewed between July 26-28, 2023. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, and education based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as past vote. The margin of error is ±3.2 points.

Toplines:



Source link

The economy’s long, hot, and uncertain summer — CBS News poll


Never mind the macro stats for the U.S. economy — Americans are hot, and very much still bothered by high prices, with recent reports about GDP growth, stock gains and a strong labor market apparently providing cold comfort. At least so far.

Instead, most describe the economy as “uncertain,” along with calling it bad, and “struggling” but not improved. 

So, there’s plenty of lagging skepticism hanging over the public mind after the turmoil of recent years and months of chatter about a potential recession. Almost no one is calling things “stable.”

And that’s the case despite relatively good feelings about the job market and job security. 

It’s not just whether one has a job, but what your wages can buy you. Most of those working say their pay is not keeping pace with rising prices. 

(The fact that most report paying higher electric bills and being forced indoors because of the heat waves may not be helping the mood either.) 

And even if the rate of inflation is slowing, those price hikes have clearly left their mark. 

Prices are the No. 1 reason people give when asked why they call the economy bad and the top reason given when they describe their personal financial situation as bad. 

Interest rates, they report, are also a net-negative on their collective finances. Most, particularly younger people, report it’s harder to buy a home than for past generations. 

It all adds up to most feeling they’re staying in place financially but not getting ahead, and many feeling that they’re falling behind and concerned about affording things now and retirement in the longer term. 

As is often the case in these kinds of economic evaluations, what people see at the cashier, or on their bills on the kitchen table, has outsized impact over more abstract economic reports.

getting-ahead-falling-behind.png

income-keeping-up-inflation.png

describe-economy.png

Here’s that comparison: Americans rate the job market stronger than the overall economy.

economy-vs-job-market.png

But many still think the prices they pay are going up. That may comport with macro data saying inflation is slowing, but price increases are still felt by consumers.

prices-going-up.png

economy-rating-trend.png

The politics

There’s plenty of skepticism about help from political leaders on either side of the aisle. It isn’t good news for the president.

Most tie both the U.S. economy and their own personal finances (whether bad or good) at least in part to President Biden’s policies — an important measure of both macro and micro connection — and also to that very immediate measure of prices.

biden-policies-economy-finances.png

Most don’t think the Biden administration is lowering inflation — another key metric to watch in coming months — and even fewer think congressional Republicans are taking actions that do so, with many not sure what they’ve done. As they campaigned to win the House majority last year, most voters expected them to prioritize dealing with inflation.

(For that matter, just a quarter think the Federal Reserve’s actions have lowered inflation, though many aren’t sure what it has done.)

inflation-biden-admin-actions.png

inflation-cong-reps-actions.png

inflation-fed-reserve-actions.png

The race to define “Bidenomics”

This also shows the challenge President Biden faces in his latest push to get the public to reconsider not just how they think of the economy, which few describe as “rebounding,” but also the meaning of the phrase his   administration has coined, “Bidenomics.” 

It is not, as of yet, a widely known term by any means.

The people who say they have heard something of the term skew Republican right now. So, to many of them, it looks more pejorative. Half say they equate it with “higher inflation” and even “tax increases,” by far the top two items chosen. That said, most independents also mention those two items first.

Democrats are more positive — if they’ve heard of it — so the president at least has some building blocks with his base. Majorities of them say it means “job creation,” “investment in infrastructure,” “help for the poor” and “the middle class” to them.

bidenomics-familiarity.png

bidenomics-description.png

But this economic mood keeps weighing on the president’s overall numbers. His handling of the economy is as low as it’s been, along with his overall approval rating too, which has been hovering in the low-40s range for more than a year, now down to 40%.

biden-approval-trend.png

biden-approval-on-economy-trend.png

The heat

And yes, most Americans are hot and report feeling unusually high temperatures in all regions of the country, as much of the U.S. sets heat records. They’re coping by staying inside more, keeping their kids inside and economically, one impact they report is having to pay higher electric bills.

high-temperatures.png

changes-due-to-high-temperatures.png

This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,181 U.S. adult residents interviewed between July 26-28, 2023. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, and education based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as past vote. The margin of error is ±3.2 points.

Toplines:



Source link