‘It’s possible’ Speaker Johnson could lose his job over Ukraine vote: GOP congressman


IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

  • Now Playing

    ‘It’s possible’ Speaker Johnson could lose his job over Ukraine vote: GOP congressman

    01:15

  • UP NEXT

    Rep. Clyburn defends U.S. aid to Israel: ‘Leverage has to be used’ but ‘we have to keep our word’

    02:47

  • ‘At this point, there’s not a specific crime’ to impeach Biden over, says GOP congressman

    01:05

  • GOP Rep. Bacon says federal government has a ‘role’ in Baltimore bridge rebuild: Full interview

    10:53

  • Rep. Clyburn says Clinton, Obama will appear more on campaign trail to show ‘unity’: Full interview

    12:02

  • Clyburn says he didn’t work with Republicans on gerrymandered map: ‘I offered my suggestions’

    01:53

  • Savannah Guthrie says ‘God understands’ people who’ve lost their faith: Full interview

    19:31

  • It’s ‘possible’ Dobbs could be overturned: Justice Breyer full interview

    01:09:52

  • South Carolina will use district map previously deemed illegal in 2024 House election

    04:40

  • ‘Evan is not here’: Gershkovich’s parents speak out a full year since his arrest

    06:19

  • Israeli delegation visit to Washington to be rescheduled amid diplomatic strains

    03:40

  • House Republicans plan next steps in twin impeachment inquiries

    02:50

  • Gov. Walz: Uncommitted voters were expressing ‘frustration,’ but ‘will come home’ to Biden

    06:57

  • Hunter Biden lawyers ask judge to dismiss tax charges

    02:17

  • Speaker Johnson has to ‘have the spine’ to bring Ukraine aid to floor, Democratic congressman says

    07:02

  • Brother of Baltimore bridge worker shares frustration over recovery mission

    01:57

  • Democrats optimistic about 2024 chances in North Carolina

    04:09

  • Lara Trump on 2020 election: ‘That’s in the past’

    13:32

  • Supreme Court may rely on ‘procedural punt’ in abortion pill case, says legal expert

    04:55

  • Johnson needs to compromise with Democrats to retain speakership, Rep. Quigley says

    08:05

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) tells Meet the Press that there are “one or two people that are not team players” in the House Republican conference, and they may choose to vote to remove Speaker Johnson over a vote to support aid to Ukraine.



Source link

House to send DHS Secretary Mayorkas’ impeachment to Senate on April 10, Speaker Mike Johnson says


WASHINGTON — Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., notified Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Thursday that the House will send impeachment articles against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas to the upper chamber on April 10.

Johnson and 11 GOP-appointed impeachment managers said in a letter to Schumer that they will present the “duly passed articles of impeachment” the House passed against Mayorkas on that day, when the Senate will be back in session. 

“We urge you to schedule a trial of the matter expeditiously,” the letter to Schumer said. 

The GOP-controlled House voted to impeach Mayorkas on Feb. 13 for “high crimes and misdemeanors, including his willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law and his breach of the public trust,” the letter said. 

“The evidence on both charges is clear, comprehensive, and compelling,” they added. Mayorkas is the second Cabinet member to be impeached in U.S. history after William Belknap, who was the secretary of war under then-President Ulysses S. Grant.

They argued that Mayorkas violated U.S. immigration laws and is “responsible for releasing millions of illegal aliens into the interior and creating unlawful mass-parole programs.” The lawmakers also accused the DHS secretary of lying to Congress and the public “about the scope of the crisis and his role in it.” 

Referring to the migrant situation at the U.S.-Mexico border, Johnson and the impeachment managers said Americans “demand a secure border, an end to this crisis, and accountability for those responsible.”

NBC News has reached out to Schumer’s office for comment.

This is a developing story.





Source link

Should House Speaker Johnson be worried about ouster threat?


Should House Speaker Johnson be worried about ouster threat? – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Marjorie Taylor Greene is looking to oust Mike Johnson as House speaker. CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett and political strategists Hogan Gidley and Chuck Rocha join “America Decides” to examine if Johnson should be worried.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy: “Do not be fearful of a motion to vacate”


Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy: “Do not be fearful of a motion to vacate” – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy tells “Face the Nation” that he doesn’t believe that the motion to vacate current Speaker Michael Johnson will be successful. Although McCarthy was removed from his post by a similar action, he said “do not be fearful of a motion to vacate.”

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy: “Do not be fearful of a motion to vacate”


Washington — Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who last year was the first speaker in history to be ousted from his post, suggested on Sunday that a motion to vacate the current speaker is unlikely.

“Do not be fearful of a motion to vacate,” McCarthy said on “Face the Nation” on Sunday. “I do not think they could do it again.”

As Congress voted to approve a spending package in recent days, bringing to an end a monthslong fight over funding the government that began when McCarthy was speaker, a new threat to oust his replacement has emerged. 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, filed a motion to vacate, teasing a possible vote to oust House Speaker Mike Johnson. 

But McCarthy, who represented California’s 20th district until he resigned from Congress late last year after losing the gavel, said he doesn’t believe a motion will come up or that Democrats will go along with it.

1711297597086.png
Kevin McCarthy on “Face the Nation,” March 24, 2024.

CBS News


“We’re close to the election. We’ve watched what transpired the last time you went three weeks without Congress being able to act,” McCarthy said. “You can’t do anything if you don’t have a speaker. I think we’ve moved past that.”

McCarthy said the conference should instead focus on the country and the job they have to do, telling them to “just move forward” while making clear that Johnson “is doing the very best job he can.”

Upon the House’s return from a two-week recess, the chamber could consider the measure, which a group of conservatives used to oust McCarthy last year due to similar frustrations with his handling of government funding. 

Greene called the move a warning to Johnson after he brought the funding package to the floor without the customary 72-hour waiting period. The Georgia Republican bashed the spending agreement, claiming that Johnson had given away his negotiating power to Democrats. Ultimately, most House Republicans opposed the spending bill, as Democrats propelled it to passage.

But it remains unclear whether there’s enough political will among the House GOP conference to oust and replace another speaker. House Republicans struggled for weeks to coalesce behind a new speaker after McCarthy was removed last year. And Johnson’s ascension came after three previous candidates failed to gain the necessary support. 

Things have grown even more difficult for the conference since McCarthy’s departure, as the majority in the chamber has gradually shrunk. Rep. Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican, announced on Friday he will step down in April, shrinking the already-thin Republican majority in the House to a one-seat majority from a five-seat majority six months ago. 

Still, McCarthy projected confidence that House Republicans can continue to govern. 

“You have the majority,” McCarthy said. “You can still govern and use that power to do exactly that.”

Rep. Michael McCaul, a Texas Republican who also appeared on “Face the Nation” seemed to agree, saying that the House needs to remain focused on governing, rather than descending into another dispute over its speaker. 

“We don’t need dysfunction right now,” McCaul said Sunday. “And with the world on fire the way it is, we need to govern and that is not just Republicans but in a bipartisan way.”



Source link

Transcript: Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy on “Face the Nation,” March 24, 2024


The following is a transcript of an interview with former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy that aired on March 24, 2024.


MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to the former Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, who joins us this morning from Bakersfield, California. Good to have you back on the program, sir.

FMR. SPEAKER KEVIN MCCARTHY: Thank you. Thanks for having me on.

MARGARET BRENNAN: So since you left Congress, we’ve had four high profile Republican departures, including Mike Gallagher, a- a young rising star, someone you put in key positions, you know, announced retirements, including from one of your lieutenants, Patrick McHenry. Is the chaos within your caucus driving these departures?

MCCARTHY: I think it’s causing some of it, yes. I mean, the difficulty here is when you allow eight Republicans to join with all the Democrats to determine who can run the House when 96% decide one way, it creates some chaos. They’ve got to move through this, put the country first and be able to move on. I think they’re able to do that. Speaker Johnson is doing the very best job he can. It’s a difficult situation but look, the one advice I would give to the Conference and to the Speaker is do not be fearful of a motion to vacate. I do not think they could do it again, that was surely based on Matt Gaetz trying to stop an ethics complaint. I don’t think the Democrats will go along with it too. Focus on the country, focus on the job you’re supposed to do, and actually do it fearlessly. Just move forward.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Patrick McHenry, one of your lieutenants, said you can either die a Speaker and worry about them taking you out or live every day as your last. Are you suggesting Speaker Johnson is afraid to take a vote on something? 

MCCARTHY: No, no, not at all–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –Like Ukraine?

MCCARTHY: No, no, I don’t think- I don’t think Speaker Johnson’s afraid at all and I don’t believe the motion will come up. What the- the motion Marjorie put in was not privileged. So it’s not- it’s not being called up for a vote. I don’t think the Democrats will go along with this either. We’re close to the election. We watched what transpired the last time you went three weeks without Congress being able to act. You can’t do anything if you don’t have a Speaker. I think we’ve moved past that. We’ve got a lot of challenges. We got FISA coming up before us, we’ve got Ukraine funding, we’ve got a border wide open. Those are the issues the country is actually looking on the economy and others. If we focus on the country, and what the country desire, I think the personalities can solve their own problems.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, when you were in Washington, you used to deal with Marjorie Taylor Greene who filed this motion to vacate to oust the Speaker. She’s blaming Johnson for everything from chaos at the border. She says she’s starting this process to end the chaos that Americans are living in every single day. Do you endorse her tactic? What’s the game here?

MCCARTHY: Look, the one thing I’ve always found, when you sit down with a member and talk to them, find out what their concerns are, especially when it’s based upon policy, you can solve that problem. And I watched that with Marjorie from the vote to Speaker or to the vote for the Fiscal Responsibility Act. There’s times she was a difference of opinion to you sit down and find common ground. Matt’s case was much different. It’s about a personal thing that he had done and that’s what he was trying to get something illegally stopped. This is not the case here. So I would not be afraid of a motion to vacate. This is about policy. And you remember, our government is to- is designed to find common ground. And we’ve got a small majority. But remember, Margaret, in those nine months, what was the small majority able to do? We actually passed the strongest border security bill, it’s now struck in the Senate, an energy independence bill. We stopped DC from decriminalizing–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –It’s dead on arrival Senate.

MCCARTHY: We made the largest–

MARGARET BRENNAN: It’s stuck there.

MCCARTHY: But- but this is what did come into law, the largest cut in American history more than 2 trillion–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –Yeah.

MCCARTHY: Welfare reform took 20 billion back from the IRS going after Americans. NEPA reform hadn’t done in 40 years, Parents’ Bill of Rights. We’ve proven we can govern in many ways which would actually show to the American public if we had a new president, got a majority in the Senate, America would be much stronger. 

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, you’ve twice now mentioned Matt Gaetz. So I want to just ask you if you have evidence to back up your allegation?

MCCARTHY: Well, I think the Ethics Committee- it was purely Matt coming to me trying- trying me to do something illegal to stop the Ethics Committee from moving forward in investigation that was started long before I became a Speaker–

MARGARET BRENNAN: –Something illegal?

MCCARTHY: I would not do that. don’t know what the fact- I don’t know what the facts are there. It’s a personal issue of what he’d done as a member of Congress. I simply would say the Ethics Committee has the right to look at whatever they’re going forward and I’m not going to get in the middle of it one way or another.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Okay. Putting that to the side, I want to talk about what you are actually seeing happen with legislation because a lot of Americans look at what’s happening and say, this is chaos. We want actual, real problems dealt with. On the national security front, that used to be a priority for Republicans. But as we were just talking about with Chair McCaul, Johnson hasn’t given any timeline, really, for a vote on this Ukraine package, nor for Israel, nor for Taiwan. Who is he afraid of? Is it Mr. Trump?

MCCARTHY: No, I don’t think he’s afraid of anyone. Remember, you have certain things before you, government funding–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Why not set a date?

MCCARTHY: Well, I think- I think- I think he is setting a date, you also have to have- educate the members, be able to move forward with that. I’ve always believed, in that situation, when I was Speaker, securing the border, and dealing with foreign policy, you could do at the same time and together. What I was going to move forward is, take our H.R. 2 and also deal with the security issue. I think Israel is actually different, that should have been moved forward with no pay for, long before, especially right after October 7. Because we have a world that looks like the 1930s, you’ve got this new axis of evil with China, Russia, Iran, bounding together. You don’t want to send the wrong message–

MARGARET BRENNAN: But that- that was a Johnson choice that you’re criticizing there.

MCCARTHY: Well, what I’m saying is, you need to work together to move forward. You’ve got to secure the American border. What I would use is the power of the majority, is to sit down just as we did with the Fiscal Responsibility Act, go directly to the president. If you sit around and try to do four leaders, you’re never going to get to an answer. Sit down and negotiate with the President directly about border security and Ukraine and Taiwan. I believe you would get to an answer. And you’ve got the power, and use that power of the majority to move. I believe when you come back, you just heard the Chairman there–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well it- it’s barely a majority at- at this- at this point, I mean, by the end of April, you’re gonna be down to 217 Republicans to 213 Democrats. I mean, the dynamics and change here, should you have- should you have stayed in Congress?

MCCARTHY: Well, the one thing I will tell you, you still have the majority. Remember, when we had a small majority of just five, we did pass the most conservative border security bill. We did cut more than $2 trillion. We did pass a Parents Bill of Rights. We did be able to reform welfare. So we did things other Congress couldn’t do with 30 seat majority. You have the majority, you can still govern and use that power to do exactly that.

MARGARET BRENNAN: It- it sounds like you’re- you’re providing some coaching advice there. Sir, I want to ask you- ask you, though. Do you speak to Speaker Johnson? And I know you do speak to President- former President Trump, do you have plans to return to government potentially in a Trump administration?

MCCARTHY: Look, I’ve always said I- I will serve whichever way I- if I’m the best person for the job. But I think people worried about whether they get a job in the next administration is the wrong place to be. You first have to have the election. I think you should be going out to the American public and showing them, yes, with President Trump get elected, we would have a secure border, we’d have a stronger economy. We wouldn’t be evacuating five embassies, we wouldn’t have war around the world–

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, those are counterfactuals.

MCCARTHY: We would be much stronger and the future would be much brighter.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Those- those are counterfactuals.

MCCARTHY: I don’t think so. I served- I served with both presidents. That’s exactly the situation today. We have evacuated five embassies under President Biden. We’ve had high inflation under President Biden. We have a wide open border. We have people who are on the terrorist watch list- more people in one month of February getting across our border than the entire time when–

MARGARET BRENNAN: And we’re gonna–

MCCARTHY: –President Trump was in office. So–

MARGARET BRENNAN: And we’re gonna–

MCCARTHY: That’s the actual truths of what’s happening today.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well we’re going to talk to the head of Border Patrol later in the program and our immigration correspondent about some of the specifics of those issues. Kevin McCarthy, thank you for coming back. “Face the Nation” will be back in a minute. Stay with us.



Source link

Rep. Michael McCaul says Speaker Mike Johnson is in a “difficult spot” regarding Ukraine aid bill


Rep. Michael McCaul says Speaker Mike Johnson is in a “difficult spot” regarding Ukraine aid bill – CBS News

Watch CBS News


Republican Rep. Michael McCaul, the chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, tells “Face the Nation” that House Speaker Mike Johnson is in a “difficult spot” regarding a bill offering aid to Ukraine. Despite the threat of a motion to vacate, McCaul said Johnson “knows how important” it is to offer aid to Ukraine.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link